2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-015-9472-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Size Determination Within the Scope of Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Special Focus on Testing the Rasch Model

Abstract: This paper refers to the exponential family of probability distributions and the conditional maximum likelihood (CML) theory. It is concerned with the determination of the sample size for three groups of tests of linear hypotheses, known as the fundamental trinity of Wald, score, and likelihood ratio tests. The main practical purpose refers to the special case of tests of the class of Rasch models. The theoretical background is discussed and the formal framework for sample size calculations is provided, given … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in the conditional framework, a sample size around 390 participants is sufficient to detect a model deviation in item difficulty of 1 logit with a significance level of 5% and power of 80%. However, since these samples requirements are influenced by several factors including targeting [72], other authors have argued that samples with more than 250 participants provide enough power for most practical purposes [73]. The overall model fit was evaluated with a summary item-trait χ 2 statistic, which is calculated through the summation of the χ 2 of all individual items [63].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in the conditional framework, a sample size around 390 participants is sufficient to detect a model deviation in item difficulty of 1 logit with a significance level of 5% and power of 80%. However, since these samples requirements are influenced by several factors including targeting [72], other authors have argued that samples with more than 250 participants provide enough power for most practical purposes [73]. The overall model fit was evaluated with a summary item-trait χ 2 statistic, which is calculated through the summation of the χ 2 of all individual items [63].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, we would compare the depression across multiple cohorts, but we have extensive data on the relevant covariates for these two cohorts only and, therefore, we included only these cohorts. However, according to recent research, the sample had sufficient statistical power for estimation of RM (Draxler & Alexandrowicz, 2015). Regarding the depression items themselves, we do not have exact knowledge on the source of each individual item and how they were selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a proof of the asymptotic distribution under an alternative, we need to assume that parameters β a converge to β 0 for n → ∞. A similar method was used for CML and exponential family models (Draxler & Alexandrowicz, 2015) and for MML and tests based on contingency tables (Maydeu-Olivares & Montaño, 2013). The asymptotic distribution of the statistics depends on the consistency of the maximum likelihood (ML) parameter estimator (e.g., Casella & Berger, 2002).…”
Section: Power Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they rely on an asymptotic result, the agreement of the corresponding expected and observed distributions will be higher in larger samples and for lower differences |β − β 0 |, i.e., lower effect sizes. The reliance on these results can be considered common practice according to Agresti (2013) and has been shown to involve only minor errors in a simulation study by Draxler and Alexandrowicz (2015) in the CML context. Also, note that the test of the null hypothesis, i.e., a test against a central χ 2 distribution, involves a similar assumption.…”
Section: Power Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation