2016
DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2015.1124279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample size determination strategies for normal tolerance intervals using historical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of these strategies assume there is some historical data and specification limits for the process at-hand. We briefly illustrate these strategies below and refer the reader to Young et al (2016) for further details.…”
Section: Sample Size Determination Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both of these strategies assume there is some historical data and specification limits for the process at-hand. We briefly illustrate these strategies below and refer the reader to Young et al (2016) for further details.…”
Section: Sample Size Determination Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for one-sided upper tolerance limits, one-sided lower tolerance limits, or equal-tailed tolerance intervals, respectively. As emphasized in Young et al (2016), this approach is intended simply for planning purposes and it does not guarantee any specific bounds relative to the nominal coverage probability. Note that (29) is for an equal-tailed tolerance interval since we posit values for µ and σ and, thus, the resulting tolerance interval would be built around a (hypothetically) true center of the normal population.…”
Section: Sample Size Determination Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, their work was aimed at assessing results from an MRI‐guided prostate biopsy research trial. Young et al addressed the conformance to specifications during the design verification stage of a medical device that aids in the treatment of refractory epilepsy and treatment‐resistant depression. Lizotte and Tahmasebi assessed the variability in individual outcomes under a dynamic treatment regime to provide patient‐centered data‐driven sequential decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, researchers have proposed TIs for a normal distribution. [12][13][14][15][16] Simultaneously, many studies on the TI for an exponential distribution also emerged. [17][18][19][20] Besides, TIs have also been studied for the Pareto distribution, 21 hypergeometric distribution or negative hypergeometric distribution, 22 and binomial distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%