1981
DOI: 10.2307/1911523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: A Comment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
145
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
145
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Beginning in the late 1970s (Greene, 1981;Heckman, 1976Heckman, , 1978Heckman, , 1979, methods for detecting and statistically correcting selection bias were developed in economics and related areas. In the decades since, as noted by Cuddleback and colleagues (2004), an extensive literature has evolved in the area of sample selection bias (Berk, 1983;Stolzenberg & Relles, 1997).…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning in the late 1970s (Greene, 1981;Heckman, 1976Heckman, , 1978Heckman, , 1979, methods for detecting and statistically correcting selection bias were developed in economics and related areas. In the decades since, as noted by Cuddleback and colleagues (2004), an extensive literature has evolved in the area of sample selection bias (Berk, 1983;Stolzenberg & Relles, 1997).…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OLS standard errors have to be corrected to account for these particularities. An estimator of the asymptotic covariance matrix is provided by Heckman (1979) and Greene (1981). The covariance matrix may also be estimated by means of bootstrapping techniques, as provided by most commercial statistical software.…”
Section: Generalized Tobit Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two methods of estimating this model, two step (not two stage) least squares and maximum likelihood. The two step method was proposed by Heckman (1979) [see also, Greene (1981Greene ( , 2003]. The logic of Heckman's method is strikingly simple.…”
Section: Incidental Truncation and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%