2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1369-7021(10)70143-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample preparation for SEM of plant surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf samples collected from inner, middle, and outer leaf positions of 5-month-old plants were cut into about 1 cm 2 pieces and briefly treated with frozen methanol in liquid nitrogen (Pathan et al, 2010). The frozen samples were freeze-dried for 24 h prior to examination of epicuticular wax crystallization patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf samples collected from inner, middle, and outer leaf positions of 5-month-old plants were cut into about 1 cm 2 pieces and briefly treated with frozen methanol in liquid nitrogen (Pathan et al, 2010). The frozen samples were freeze-dried for 24 h prior to examination of epicuticular wax crystallization patterns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine sections of tissue from each treatment were fixed in a 25 g/L gluteraldehyde solution for 1 h, and post‐fixed in 10 g/L osmium tetroxide solution for 2 h (Pathan et al . ). Samples were dipped in liquid nitrogen and then freeze‐dried (Clean Vac 8, Incheon, Korea).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The tissues were then rinsed 3 times each one for 10 min in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), and dehydrated through an ethanol series, 25, 50, 70, 90, and 100% dry, 15 min each step, 2 × 100% (Mahto & Das, ; Parker, Parker, Smith, & Waldron, ; Talbot & White, ; Uwins, Murray, & Gould, ). The preparation process was then followed by chemical drying via HMDS, under a laboratory hood overnight (Berger et al, ; Bray, Bagu, & Koegler, ; Maricle et al, ; Pathan et al, ). Each specimen was mounted onto the aluminum stub using double‐sided sticky carbon tabs, and each surface was gold‐coated to create electrical conductivity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative methods have been developed for the study of micromechanical changes and the microstructure of potato tissue based on the images obtained by SEM (Gibson, 2012;Konstankiewicz et al, 2001a;Mahto & Das, 2014;Singh et al, 2005). The common standard preparation procedures of biological materials for SEM analysis include glutaraldehyde fixation, graded ethanol dehydration, and CPD and metal coating, which all can alter tissue dimensions (Karcz et al, 2012;Pathan et al, 2010). Some authors have used hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) as a time-saving and inexpensive chemical drying technique and claimed that HMDS and is preferred over other drying methods since its causes remarkable preservation of plant cell structure (Berger et al, 2016;Maricle, Koteyeva, Voznesenskaya, Thomasson, & Edwards, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%