2005
DOI: 10.2116/analsci.21.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Preparation for Evaluation of Detection Limits in X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 mg of each standard was separately mixed into suspension with 1 l of Milli‐Q water in a sealed flask and vacuum filtered through individual QFFs to yield 42 filter paper standards. Dispersing the sediment this way ensured that each QFF had a homogeneous covering of sediment after filtering, an essential step because surface roughness, uneven sediment distribution, differing densities, and mixtures of different particle sizes can all produce spectra that deviate from the expected theory making them difficult to interpret quantitatively (Tiwari et al ., ; Maruyama et al ., ). The sediment loaded filters were dried at 105 °C for 2 h before being re‐weighed to determine the mass of trapped sediment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…25 mg of each standard was separately mixed into suspension with 1 l of Milli‐Q water in a sealed flask and vacuum filtered through individual QFFs to yield 42 filter paper standards. Dispersing the sediment this way ensured that each QFF had a homogeneous covering of sediment after filtering, an essential step because surface roughness, uneven sediment distribution, differing densities, and mixtures of different particle sizes can all produce spectra that deviate from the expected theory making them difficult to interpret quantitatively (Tiwari et al ., ; Maruyama et al ., ). The sediment loaded filters were dried at 105 °C for 2 h before being re‐weighed to determine the mass of trapped sediment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, the location or distribution of heteroatoms can be revealed by analyzing an EDX map (Pendashteh et al, 2017). Compared to EDX, the XRF measuring setup is less complicated, and the detection limit of XRF is lower (XRF ppm; EDX 0.1%) (Jembrih-Simbürger et al, 2002;Tiwari et al, 2005). Additionally, no vacuum is needed because no scattering takes place between the X-rays and the air.…”
Section: Chemical Functionalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portable X‐ray fluorescence analysis (pXRF) is a nondestructive method, that has been used for the element's hotspot analysis since the beginning of the 2000s (Kalnicky & Singhvi, 2001; Ravansari et al, 2020; Ravansari & Lemke, 2018). The technique is based on measuring the atomic emission of X‐ray fluorescence to determine both qualitative and quantitative elemental composition (Tiwari et al, 2005). Feasibility of this method for heavy metals analysis in soil has been proven in literature (Chakraborty et al, 2017; Paulette et al, 2015; Rouillon & Taylor, 2016) and standardized (USEPA, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%