1992
DOI: 10.1214/aop/1176989524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Path Properties of the Local Times of Strongly Symmetric Markov Processes Via Gaussian Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A major problem in this field is to decide whether the mapping (r, t) → L(r, t) has a continuous version. This has been solved in a remarkable paper by Barlow [4], see also [3] and Marcus and Rosen [114] in the symmetric case. Proposition 8.1 provides a simple expression for the Laplace exponent Φ of the inverse local time, which is explicit in terms of the characteristic exponent Ψ.…”
Section: Local Time At a Fixed Pointmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A major problem in this field is to decide whether the mapping (r, t) → L(r, t) has a continuous version. This has been solved in a remarkable paper by Barlow [4], see also [3] and Marcus and Rosen [114] in the symmetric case. Proposition 8.1 provides a simple expression for the Laplace exponent Φ of the inverse local time, which is explicit in terms of the characteristic exponent Ψ.…”
Section: Local Time At a Fixed Pointmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The distribution of the local times for a Borel right process can be fully characterized by certain associated Gaussian processes; results of this flavor go by the name of Isomorphism Theorems. Several versions have been developed by Ray [44] and Knight [33], Dynkin [18,17], Marcus and Rosen [40,41], Eisenbaum [19] and Eisenbaum, Kaspi, Marcus, Rosen and Shi [20]. In what follows, we present the second Ray-Knight theorem in the special case of a continuous-time random walk.…”
Section: Lemma 113 (Matthews Bound) For Everymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there is a modification of the local time such that it is continuous in (x, t), we say that X has a jointly continuous local time. Necessary and suffcient conditions for the joint continuity of the local times of Lévy processes have been proved by Barlow and Hawkes [2], Barlow [1], and by Marcus and Rosen [19] using different methods.…”
Section: Proof For the Lower Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%