1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5721-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample-Path Analysis of Queueing Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All the processes introduced below are assumed to be defined on a common probability space, on which a probability measure P is defined. Let N i [a, b] be the 2 Examples have been obtained in [6] for the single class case number of class i arrivals in the interval [a, b]. We assume that the limits…”
Section: Discriminatory Processor Sharing: Model and Analysissupporting
confidence: 41%
“…All the processes introduced below are assumed to be defined on a common probability space, on which a probability measure P is defined. Let N i [a, b] be the 2 Examples have been obtained in [6] for the single class case number of class i arrivals in the interval [a, b]. We assume that the limits…”
Section: Discriminatory Processor Sharing: Model and Analysissupporting
confidence: 41%
“…Equivalently, the output rate should equal the input rate at each facility. This is called rate stability and, because it deals in long-run averages, can be analyzed on a pathwise basis (i.e., deterministically)-see El-Taha and Stidham (1999). For systems with sufficient probabilistic structure, "stable" can be strengthened to mean that there exists a proper limiting or at least stationary distribution for the system state (e.g., the vector of contents at each facility).…”
Section: Stability and Fluid Modelscontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…Later work by Stidham, El-Taha, and others showed that the same was true with relations between time-stationary and Palm distributions and (to a lesser extent) insensitivity. The book by El-Taha and Stidham (1999) offers a compendium of results like these (as well as other results) achievable by samplepath analysis. See also Sigman (1995), Serfozo (1999).…”
Section: / Stidhammentioning
confidence: 41%
“…Since, for spatially constant ρ, the value of ρ coincides with the WIP W (t), and since in the time-independent case C = 1 T1 holds, we obtain the relation W = λT 1 . Thus we recover, up to a scaling factor introduced by using arrival probabilities instead of the arrival density, the well-known Little's law W = λτ [12], [7] for the steady-state situation.…”
Section: = T (R) ω(R T)r T (R ) Dr − ω(R T)rt (R) Which Implies ωmentioning
confidence: 48%