2015
DOI: 10.3133/ds918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample descriptions and geophysical logs for cored well BP-3-USGS, Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve, Alamosa County, Colorado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Faulted sediments and/or sedimentary rocks are an obvious possibility. However, known density contrasts present across lithologic boundaries within the sedimentary section are small (e.g., Grauch et al, 2015), so the specific geologic origin of those density contrasts is unknown. Alternate possibilities are locally inadequate terrain corrections, and unrecognized problems with the AGG data processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Faulted sediments and/or sedimentary rocks are an obvious possibility. However, known density contrasts present across lithologic boundaries within the sedimentary section are small (e.g., Grauch et al, 2015), so the specific geologic origin of those density contrasts is unknown. Alternate possibilities are locally inadequate terrain corrections, and unrecognized problems with the AGG data processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of unsaturated dune sand was estimated at 1800 kg/m 3 by Nettleton profiling (Nettleton, 1942;Drenth, 2013). The estimated density of saturated dune sand, 2080 kg/m 3 , is from a shallow density log near the western portion of the dunefield (Grauch et al, 2015). This density value is only an estimate because the sand sampled by the density log may be mainly part of the Alamosa Formation and not directly representative of sand in the dunefield (Madole et al, 2008(Madole et al, , 2013Grauch et al, 2015).…”
Section: Forward Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation