Samhandling mellom barnevern og psykisk helsevern for barn og unge – en litteraturgjennomgang

Fossum, Sturla; Lauritzen, Camilla; Vis, Svein Arild; Ottosen, Agnetha; Rustad, Kirsten Buck

doi:10.18261/issn1891-1838-2015-04-04

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 21 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Similarly, Ose, Mandal, and Mordal (2014) reported that NAV workers delimited their personal roles and responsibilities, although tasks are regulated in a broader spectrum of responsibility for the recipients of NAV's services. Fossum et al (2014) described similar findings regarding partnership. The differences regarding professional background and organizational culture were highlighted as constraints on collaboration.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 64%

“…Regarding aspects of sharing, Fossum et al (2014) similarly found with respect to shared data that CWP did not collect relevant data on families from other welfare services.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, reviews of studies on collaborations in public welfare services in Norway have been of interest (Fossum, Lauritzen, Vis, Ottosen, & Rustad, 2014;Lo, Olsen, & Anvik, 2016). Fossum et al (2014) found that organizational, economic, professional, and methodological differences, as well as differences in competence, challenged child welfare services' collaborations and the psychological health of team members aiming to serve youth.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Interprofessional collaboration in the Norwegian welfare context: a scoping review

Pedersen

2019

Journal of Interprofessional Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Joint efforts among welfare services are often needed to provide help to people with complex needs. Interprofessional collaboration is believed to play an important part in successful service provisions. In Norway, a strong political will and significant efforts are focused on financing and implementing policies to support interprofessional collaboration. Despite this, empirical literature on the topic is fragmented. An overview of interprofessional collaboration in Norway is internationally relevant since the complexity in social service provision is experienced as challenging in different contexts. A scoping review was performed to investigate the facilitators of and constraints on interprofessional collaboration by Norwegian welfare services. After screening the relevant literature, 12 empirical studies were synthesized and analyzed using four dimensions of interprofessional collaboration (sharing, partnership, interdependence, and power). The results suggest that interprofessional collaboration by Norway's welfare services has not been fully actualized. This is partly due to the individual services' autonomy and segregation, which are reflected in laws and regulations, the funding system, and different ideological goals.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 64%

“…Regarding aspects of sharing, Fossum et al (2014) similarly found with respect to shared data that CWP did not collect relevant data on families from other welfare services.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interprofessional collaboration in the Norwegian welfare context: a scoping review

Pedersen

2019

Journal of Interprofessional Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Predictors of community versus specialty mental health service use: a prospective cohort study

Brattfjell

Jozefiak

Wichstrøm

2020

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Child and adolescent mental health specialized services (CAMHS) are supposed to serve those who are most seriously disturbed and impaired. However, little is known about how children receiving treatment at different levels of care differ. The present study seeks to determine whether having a psychiatric disorder and resulting impairment measured in early childhood increases the odds of receiving help in CAMHS versus from community services during middle childhood or whether other factors (e.g., parenting stress, family functioning) also influence service utilization. A screen-stratified sample (n = 995 of the 2003-2004 birth cohorts) in Trondheim, Norway was assessed biennially from age 4-12 with semi-structured diagnostic interviews and recording of service use, family functioning, parental perceived need, and parenting stress. Behavioral disorders more strongly predicted CAMHS than community service use, whereas impairment predicted community service use. However, impairment increased the odds of receiving services in CAMHS if the parents perceived a need for help. Parental perceived need for help also increased the odds of CAMHS use independent of diagnosis and impairment. Having an emotional disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), parenting stress, previous service use, or family functioning did not predict service use at either level. Whereas children with behavioral disorders received help from CAMHS, children with emotional disorders did not receive services at either level. ADHD did not predict service use, indicating that young children with ADHD without comorbid disorders are not sufficiently detected. Efforts to detect, refer and treat emotional disorders and ADHD at the appropriate level should be increased.

show abstract

‘My disability was my own responsibility’: An institutional ethnography of the transitional experiences of disabled young people leaving care

Bennwik

Oterholm

Kelly

2023

Children and Youth Services Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Samhandling mellom barnevern og psykisk helsevern for barn og unge – en litteraturgjennomgang

Cited by 6 publications

References 21 publications

Interprofessional collaboration in the Norwegian welfare context: a scoping review

Interprofessional collaboration in the Norwegian welfare context: a scoping review

Predictors of community versus specialty mental health service use: a prospective cohort study

‘My disability was my own responsibility’: An institutional ethnography of the transitional experiences of disabled young people leaving care

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About