The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Same, same — but different: On the use of Navon derived measures of global/local processing in studies of face processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated by Gerlach and Krumborg (2014), many formerly used indexes derived from Navon's paradigm have probably been unreliable. To avoid this problem, we use an index of global/local shape bias which is based on the standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) between RTs to Local Consistent and Global Consistent trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As demonstrated by Gerlach and Krumborg (2014), many formerly used indexes derived from Navon's paradigm have probably been unreliable. To avoid this problem, we use an index of global/local shape bias which is based on the standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) between RTs to Local Consistent and Global Consistent trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this problem, we use an index of global/local shape bias which is based on the standardized mean difference (Cohen's d) between RTs to Local Consistent and Global Consistent trials. In comparison with other indexes derived from Navon's paradigm, this index, which we term the Global-Local precedence index, is pure, because it measures differences in global and local processing that are not confounded by interference effects (Gerlach & Krumborg, 2014). The higher the score on this index, the faster are responses to global as compared with local shape characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these indexes are complex in that they tap inter-level interference effects [ 2 ] while others are more simple in that they tap global/local precedence effects or interference effects confined to a particular level [ 28 ]. Considering that global/local precedence effects and inter-level interference effects reflect different mechanisms [ 30 , 31 ], it is perhaps not surprising that different results have been obtained. Furthermore, the indexes applied also seem to differ considerably in reliability [ 30 ], which may have added further to the discrepancies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that global/local precedence effects and inter-level interference effects reflect different mechanisms [ 30 , 31 ], it is perhaps not surprising that different results have been obtained. Furthermore, the indexes applied also seem to differ considerably in reliability [ 30 ], which may have added further to the discrepancies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that global/local precedence effects and interlevel interference effects reflect different mechanisms [30,31], it is perhaps not surprising that different results have been obtained. Furthermore, the indexes applied also seem to differ considerably in reliability [30], which may have added further to the discrepancies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%