1999
DOI: 10.1177/000313489906500706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Same Hospitalization Resection for Acute Diverticulitis

Abstract: We reviewed our experience with same hospitalization resection in the treatment of acute diverticulitis (AD) and compared outcomes with patients admitted for elective resection. From January 1987 through December 1996, 20 patients (Group 1) were admitted with AD and were operated on during the same hospital admission. During that same time period, 22 patients (Group 2) were admitted for elective resection and found to have an abscess intraoperatively. Thirty patients had elective resection with no abscess foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one study assessed all stages of an acute and chronic complicated as well as non-complicated sigmoid diverticular disease [ 36 ]. Across the included studies four different classification systems of sigmoid diverticular disease (Hinchey, modified Hinchey, Hansen and Stock, and CDD) were applied [ 8 , 37 – 39 ]. Two studies did not mention the underlying classification system [ 26 , 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study assessed all stages of an acute and chronic complicated as well as non-complicated sigmoid diverticular disease [ 36 ]. Across the included studies four different classification systems of sigmoid diverticular disease (Hinchey, modified Hinchey, Hansen and Stock, and CDD) were applied [ 8 , 37 – 39 ]. Two studies did not mention the underlying classification system [ 26 , 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Regarding the classification of acute diverticulitis, in 1978, Hinchey et al 31 proposed classifying perforated diverticulitis from stages I (pericolic abscess) to IV (generalized fecal peritonitis) (►Table 2). Since then, with the introduction of CT to daily clinical practice, Wasvary et al, 32 in 1999, modified the original classification by adding non-complicated diverticulitis as stage 0, and subdivided stage I into two: stage Ia, with phlegmon or pericolic inflammation, and stage Ib, with pericolic or mesocolic abscess (►Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiologists with at least 5 years of experience evaluated the CTs. The modified Hinchey classification (Wasvary [ 16 ] ) was used for the Hinchey classification in CT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the widespread use of computerized tomography (CT), which is preferred as the most sensitive tool in diagnosis, the modified Hinchey classification, which includes radiologic findings, is more commonly used ( Table 1 ). [ 14 - 16 ]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%