The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Same benefits, different communication patterns: Comparing Children's reading with a conversational agent vs. a human partner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
5
46
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Chatbots have caught the attention of language teaching researchers due to their capacity to communicate with users in the target language (Fryer et al, 2019;Jia, Chen, Ding, & Ruan, 2012;Tegos, Demetriadis, & Karakostas, 2015). Chatbot-supported language learning refers to the use of a chatbot to interact with students using natural language for daily language practice (e.g., conversation practice; Fryer et al, 2017), answering language learning questions (e.g., storybook reading; Xu, Wang, Collins, Lee, & Warschauer, 2021) and conducting assessment and providing feedback (e.g., vocabulary test; Jia et al, 2012). With the help of visual chatbot development platforms, teachers can create chatbots by themselves without prior programming experience.…”
Section: A Niche For Chatbots In Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chatbots have caught the attention of language teaching researchers due to their capacity to communicate with users in the target language (Fryer et al, 2019;Jia, Chen, Ding, & Ruan, 2012;Tegos, Demetriadis, & Karakostas, 2015). Chatbot-supported language learning refers to the use of a chatbot to interact with students using natural language for daily language practice (e.g., conversation practice; Fryer et al, 2017), answering language learning questions (e.g., storybook reading; Xu, Wang, Collins, Lee, & Warschauer, 2021) and conducting assessment and providing feedback (e.g., vocabulary test; Jia et al, 2012). With the help of visual chatbot development platforms, teachers can create chatbots by themselves without prior programming experience.…”
Section: A Niche For Chatbots In Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that English was the dominant language in the use of chatbots for students' language learning. Among 23 studies involving chatbots used for English learning, three of them were for language literature for native English speakers (Lin & Chang, 2020;Xu et al, 2021;Xu & Warschauer, 2020); the other 20 studies involved the teaching of English as a foreign language (EFL) or second language (ESL). One study involved the teaching of Chinese as a second language.…”
Section: Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, evidently, whether the integration of humanlike design components is desirable also depends on the concrete applications for which technological entities are used (e.g., (Złotowski et al, 2015;Choi & Kim, 2009;Collins, 2017;Goetz et al, 2003;Riether et al, 2012)), especially in the context of child-technology engagements (Pearson & Borenstein, 2014). For example, although social robots have proven their promising potential as learning technologies (for reviews see (Belpaeme et al, 2018;Kanero et al, 2018;Papadopoulos et al, 2020)) -and this seems to hold true for DVAs as well (e.g., (Xu et al, 2021)) -children can also develop adverse responses to too much human-likeness (e.g., (Brink et al, 2019;Woods, 2006;Yip et al, 2019)), therefore echoing Mori's (Mori, 2012) widely-cited 'uncanny valley' theorem about the eeriness of almost perfect human resemblance.…”
Section: What Are Its Consequences? Anthropomorphism From a Normative Research Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Befunde des Länderindikators 2017 verweisen zudem darauf, dass digitale Medien im Unterricht zur selbstständigen Recherche, Aufbereitung und Visualisierung von Unterrichtsinhalten eingesetzt werden können (Eickelmann et al 2017). Zur vertiefenden Auseinandersetzung mit Unterrichtsinhalten werden weiterhin Simulationsprogramme genutzt, welche die Kommunikation über Unterrichtsinhalte zwischen Schülerinnen und Schülern und Algorithmen ermöglichen (Xu et al 2021 (Dubberke et al 2008). Digitale Medien können in diesem Sinne zur Bereitstellung personalisierten Feedbacks (Levy 2009;Ware et al 2012) sowie zum Monitoring des individuellen Lernfortschritts eingesetzt werden (Faber 2020;Hillmayr et al 2017).…”
Section: Unterrichtsqualität Und Digitale Medienunclassified