2002
DOI: 10.1006/jhev.2002.0577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sambungmacan 3 and cranial variation in Asian Homo erectus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies of cranial morphology strongly suggest that Javanese H. erectus during and after the late Early Pleistocene formed a continuously evolving population lineage that was effectively independent of the H. erectus populations of northern China (Antón, 2002;Baba et al, 2003;Durband et al, 2005). If crown size reduction was a continuing trend in later Javanese H. erectus during the Middle/Late Pleistocene, like in those cases recognized in various regional groups of archaic Homo in Africa, Europe, and China (Zhang, 1991;Bermúdez de Castro and Nicolas, 1995;Bräuer and Schúltz, 1996;Kaifu et al, 2005b), it is likely that Javanese H. erectus was not ancestral to Australian Aborigines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies of cranial morphology strongly suggest that Javanese H. erectus during and after the late Early Pleistocene formed a continuously evolving population lineage that was effectively independent of the H. erectus populations of northern China (Antón, 2002;Baba et al, 2003;Durband et al, 2005). If crown size reduction was a continuing trend in later Javanese H. erectus during the Middle/Late Pleistocene, like in those cases recognized in various regional groups of archaic Homo in Africa, Europe, and China (Zhang, 1991;Bermúdez de Castro and Nicolas, 1995;Bräuer and Schúltz, 1996;Kaifu et al, 2005b), it is likely that Javanese H. erectus was not ancestral to Australian Aborigines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of Homo erectus is a controversial issue (e.g., Aguirre and de Lumley, 1977). In addition, some researchers have recently argued that the Zhoukoudian H. erectus crania are more derived than those from Indonesia or Africa (Antón, 2002;Kidder and Durband, 2004); potentially, this could apply to their teeth as well. Whatever the influence of our different H. erectus samples on P4 morphology, we also used Australopithecus and early Homo to help determine the polarity of P4 crown asymmetry.…”
Section: P4s External Contour: Asymmetry Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cranium was identified as H. erectus, but considered as more primitive than those from Zhoukoudian near Beijing and Trinil in Java (Woo, 1965). Its cranial capacity (780 cm 3 ) is almost identical to that of specimen D2880 (775 cm 3 ) from Dmanisi, Georgia (Gabunia et al, 2000;Rightmire et al, 2006), and is smaller than those from younger Chinese Middle Pleistocene adult hominins (Anton, 2002). Wu and Poirier (1995) and Schwartz and Tattersall (2003) provide detailed summaries.…”
Section: The Gongwangling Craniummentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Wu and Poirier (1995) and Schwartz and Tattersall (2003) provide detailed summaries. Although mentioned in various publications on Early Pleistocene hominin morphology (e.g., Anton, 2002), it is often overlooked and further detailed examination in the light of recent discoveries from Dmanisi (Gabunia et al, 2000;Lordkipanidze et al, 2013) and Sangiran (Zaim et al, 2011) would be advantageous. Because Gongwangling lies in the southern part of the Loess Plateau, the main means of dating the hominin cranium and other evidence is by a combination of palaeomagnetism and correlations with loess and palaeosol sequences at other sections in the Chinese Loess Plateau.…”
Section: The Gongwangling Craniummentioning
confidence: 99%