2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0709-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage Therapy Options for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Primary Radiotherapy: a Literature Review

Abstract: There does not appear to be any significant difference in overall survival for more invasive salvage radical prostatectomy compared to the minimally invasive salvage approaches. Additionally, there seems to be a trend towards lower morbidity rates associated with minimally invasive and focal salvage treatment. We are encouraged by the results presented in this review and find that there is clearly a role for emerging minimally invasive and focal therapies as durable options for salvage treatment in patients wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
3
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
3
39
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…48,49 However, no data are available for combined ADT and RT in the re-EBRT setting. 10,45,50 In our series, concomitant ADT was prescribed in 16 (25%) patients, this percentage being lower than in other series. 20,46 Whenever possible, exclusive local therapy was proposed, reserving ADT for future tumor progression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…48,49 However, no data are available for combined ADT and RT in the re-EBRT setting. 10,45,50 In our series, concomitant ADT was prescribed in 16 (25%) patients, this percentage being lower than in other series. 20,46 Whenever possible, exclusive local therapy was proposed, reserving ADT for future tumor progression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Crouzet et al reported that for locally recurrent prostate carcinoma after field external beam radiation therapy, salvage HIFU should be initiated early because of high rates of cancer‐specific and metastasis‐free survival rates. Golbari and Katz concluded that there did not appear to be any significant difference in overall survival for more‐invasive salvage radical prostatectomy compared to minimally invasive treatment of recurrent carcinoma. A consensus on a trial design to study focal salvage therapy has been published, but to date, no authoritative recommendations can be made regarding the treatment of focal recurrent disease because of the absence of randomized data and protocols .…”
Section: High‐intensity Focused Us In the Treatment Of Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several treatment options for localized prostate cancer are available including the two standard treatment options, radical prostatectomy, and radiation therapy. Although the treatment outcomes have improved the procedure and devices, the biochemical recurrence rate had not decreased yet [1] [2] [3]. Recently, many alternative and less invasive treatments have been developed for localized prostate cancer [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%