The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage surgery after definitive chemo-radiotherapy for patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, for patients with OFR, local ablative treatment is more reasonable and should be considered. Our study confirmed the previously described role of ablative salvage treatment in patients with OFR [29,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In contrast, for patients with OFR, local ablative treatment is more reasonable and should be considered. Our study confirmed the previously described role of ablative salvage treatment in patients with OFR [29,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are in line with those achieved with salvage surgery for patients with recurrent or persistent NSCLC after CRT, who are operated in centers with experience in pulmonary resections after high-dose radiotherapy. 6,[8][9][10] Approximately one-third of patients with SCLC present with LS-SCLC, and international guidelinerecommended therapy for fit patients is combined modality treatment with chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy. 3 Nevertheless, most patients had a relapse (local, distant or both) within 2 years of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the definition of salvage surgery, prior reports have described three categories [1,11]: (I) salvage surgery for local recurrence after SBRT for early-staged lung cancer; (II) salvage procedure for local recurrence or a persistent tumor after full-dose chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced lung cancer, and (III) emergent lung resection for serious adverse events of hemoptysis, an uncontrollable lung abscess, or empyema during/after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for lung cancer. Based on recently published data, surgical outcomes of salvage surgeries from categories (I) and (II) have been reported; the rates of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and 5-year overall survival were 18.9-25%, 0-4.8%, and 79.5% for category (I), respectively, and 7.9-40.0%, 0-6.7%, and 40.6-53.3% for category (II), respectively [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Although the short-and long-term results of elective salvage surgeries from categories (I) and (II) were considered feasible and acceptable, the outcomes of salvage surgeries from category (III) are less clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 First Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University, 2-3-1 Shinmachi Hirakata-shi, Osaka 573-1191, Japan. 3 First Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Infectious Disease and Allergology, Kansai Medical University, 2-3-1 Shinmachi Hirakata-shi, Osaka 573-1191, Japan. 4 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-3-1 Shinmachi Hirakata-shi, Osaka 573-1191, Japan.…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation