2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage of rib stabilization hardware with antibiotic beads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Junker et al identified increased body mass index and hemorrhagic shock at admission as risk factors for infection. 10 We agree with the management algorithm proposed by Thiels et al: in case of suspicion of superficial wound infection (e.g., purulent discharge and wound dehiscence), a prompt surgical exploration and debridement are warranted. Negative pressure dressings could be used for a second-intention healing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Junker et al identified increased body mass index and hemorrhagic shock at admission as risk factors for infection. 10 We agree with the management algorithm proposed by Thiels et al: in case of suspicion of superficial wound infection (e.g., purulent discharge and wound dehiscence), a prompt surgical exploration and debridement are warranted. Negative pressure dressings could be used for a second-intention healing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[6][7][8] As surgical fixation for rib fractures starts to gain wide acceptance, surgeons must be aware of the potential risk of infection involving the hardware. 1,4,10 However, its incidence is difficult to estimate and its treatment is not well standardized due to the lack of robust data. 1 There are few case series that advocate this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fourteen fracture studies were included, with three RCTs, two prospective observational studies, and nine retrospective studies (Table 2) [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. A total of 4,635 patients were included.…”
Section: Fracture Repairmentioning
confidence: 99%