2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05529-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage hip replacement after cut-out failure of cephalomedullary nail fixation for proximal femur fractures: a case series describing the technique and results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multicenter study by Brunner et al [ 10 ] compared a number of treatments, from solitary lag screw exchange to THA, and came to the conclusion that THA was the best option with the fewest problems. Sebastián et al [ 30 ] reported that hip replacement appeared to be a relatively safe and reliable salvage procedure for elderly and physically frail patients. Tetsunaga et al 31 report that the rate of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the group of patients who had trochanteric fractures than in the group who had femoral neck fractures (25 vs. 0%, p 0.0001), which raises questions about the superiority of hip replacement in all patients who had this complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multicenter study by Brunner et al [ 10 ] compared a number of treatments, from solitary lag screw exchange to THA, and came to the conclusion that THA was the best option with the fewest problems. Sebastián et al [ 30 ] reported that hip replacement appeared to be a relatively safe and reliable salvage procedure for elderly and physically frail patients. Tetsunaga et al 31 report that the rate of postoperative complications was significantly higher in the group of patients who had trochanteric fractures than in the group who had femoral neck fractures (25 vs. 0%, p 0.0001), which raises questions about the superiority of hip replacement in all patients who had this complication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%