2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Surgically Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Little et al 38 stated that it "seems not to be necessary to decrease the doses in patients with prior trigeminal dysfunction" and also that there is more Level III evidence for ranges of doses between 40 and 70 Gy. Hasega-wa et al 22 compared combined high doses (140-160 Gy) versus lower doses (120-135 Gy) and concluded that there was no difference in recurrence rates but that there was increased hypesthesia with the higher doses (32% vs 4%).…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little et al 38 stated that it "seems not to be necessary to decrease the doses in patients with prior trigeminal dysfunction" and also that there is more Level III evidence for ranges of doses between 40 and 70 Gy. Hasega-wa et al 22 compared combined high doses (140-160 Gy) versus lower doses (120-135 Gy) and concluded that there was no difference in recurrence rates but that there was increased hypesthesia with the higher doses (32% vs 4%).…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little et al 28 reported the use of GKSR for TN that recurred after surgery. Complete pain relief (BNI grade I) was observed in 20% of patients, and partial pain relief (BNI grade II-IIIb) was achieved in 30% of patients at 5 years.…”
Section: Percutaneous Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S et al suggested that unlike other invasive procedures, the strongest predictor of GKRS failure was a history of prior MVD. [27] This implies prior invasive treatments may be more different from each other than we think and these treatments cannot be analyzed as a single factor. In addition, the type of pain that patients suffered from in our study was not identical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%