2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage chemotherapy regimens for acute myeloid leukemia: Is one better? Efficacy comparison between CLAG and MEC regimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…122,[219][220][221][222][223][224][225][226] Enrollment in a clinical trial should therefore be the priority for such patients whenever possible. Table 8 provides recommendations for salvage regimens in patients considered fit for intensive therapy.…”
Section: Salvage Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…122,[219][220][221][222][223][224][225][226] Enrollment in a clinical trial should therefore be the priority for such patients whenever possible. Table 8 provides recommendations for salvage regimens in patients considered fit for intensive therapy.…”
Section: Salvage Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another phase I study performed by Walker et al [18] used a CLAG regimen as a treatment for R/R AML patients, and they obtained a median OS of 175 days (95% CI 16.24–333.76). In research comparing CLAG and MEC in R/R AML patients, CLAG achieved a median OS of 7.3 months, which is longer than that of MEC therapy [20]. All the above studies demonstrate that CLAG contributes to prolonged survival in R/R AML patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Similarly, poor long-term outcomes have been reported from a retrospective comparison of two alternative salvage chemotherapies. Price et al 31 reported OS at 2 years of 22% and 12%, respectively, for patients with r/r AML after chemotherapy combinations containing cladribine, cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or etoposide, cytarabine and mitoxantrone. When compared with historical data, we found a trend toward better OS of patients with relapsed AML treated within the BRIDGE trial compared with patients treated within the upfront AML 2003 trial of Study Alliance Leukemia (SAL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%