1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf00285555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salt tolerance of corn in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta of California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Andriolo et al (2005) observed a positive effect of low EC on shoot fresh mass of lettuce, which increased 28.5% from 0.8 to 1.9 dS m À1 , and then decreased 16.5% from 1.9 to 4.7 dS m À1 . The positive effect of low salinity on shoots of several plants has been reported by many other authors (Brown and Berstein, 1953, Feinerman et al, 1982, Hoffman et al, 1983. The cause is not known but could be related to mineral nutrition.…”
Section: Effects Of Irrigation Water Salinity On Vegetative Growthmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For example, Andriolo et al (2005) observed a positive effect of low EC on shoot fresh mass of lettuce, which increased 28.5% from 0.8 to 1.9 dS m À1 , and then decreased 16.5% from 1.9 to 4.7 dS m À1 . The positive effect of low salinity on shoots of several plants has been reported by many other authors (Brown and Berstein, 1953, Feinerman et al, 1982, Hoffman et al, 1983. The cause is not known but could be related to mineral nutrition.…”
Section: Effects Of Irrigation Water Salinity On Vegetative Growthmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Germination and early growth may have been affected by salt as opposed to NH 4 –N toxicity. The NH 4 –N concentrations and amounts applied PP at Site D were comparable to LSM applied at other sites, whereas the LSM had highest conductivity (Tables 2, 3), nearly 10‐fold the salt tolerance threshold level for corn of 0.37 S m −1 in soil water (Hoffman et al, 1983). The SSD applicator likely mixed the material into a greater volume of soil, reducing osmotic potential around the emerging seedling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…4 and 6, the only remaining parameter is then the electrical conductivity of the medium,  Natural aqueous environments exhibit a rather wide range of electrical conductivities. For rainwater, the values of  range from 0.02 mS/cm (approximately double of the value for pure water) to 0.15 mS/cm (143,144); for river water, typical values are in the range from 0.1 mS/cm to 0.5 mS/cm (145,146); for lake water, they range from as low as 0.1 S/m for the lakes with the highest water throughput, up to 160 mS/cm for the most hypersaline of the salt lakes (147); for sea water, they are typically in the range from 20 to 60 mS/cm (148,149). Since both the induced electric field and the temperature increase are inversely proportional to , the radii of the regions of reversible poration, irreversible poration, and thermal damage (see Fig.…”
Section: T J R T R  mentioning
confidence: 96%