2020
DOI: 10.5334/oq.80
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salt-Marsh Foraminiferal Distributions from Mainland Northern Georgia, USA: An Assessment of Their Viability for Sea-Level Studies

Abstract: We investigated foraminiferal distributions from two salt-marsh sites at Thunderbolt and Georgetown, in mainland northern Georgia, U.S. Atlantic coast. We analyzed modern epifaunal foraminiferal assemblages across multiple transects consisting of 54 surface samples. Multivariate statistical analysis (Partitioning Around Medoids and Detrended Correspondence Analysis) revealed that dead foraminiferal assemblages are divided into three faunal zones, which are elevation-dependent and site-specific. At Thunderbolt,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(115 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each 10-cm 3 sample consisted of the uppermost 1 cm of sediment, following a widely used sampling strategy designed to average out seasonal fluctuations in assemblages (Scott and Medioli, 1978;Horton and Edwards, 2003). This sampling strategy may miss the contribution of infaunal species that live at greater depths (Goldstein and Harben, 1993;Hayward et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2020), but ensures that significant changes in sea level have not occurred during the accumulation of the sediment. We added a Rose Bengal-ethanol solution to each sample within 24 h of collection to differentiate between living and dead foraminifera (Walton, 1952) and classed those with staining around the aperture and in the final chamber as living (Figueira, 2012).…”
Section: Modern Sample Collection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each 10-cm 3 sample consisted of the uppermost 1 cm of sediment, following a widely used sampling strategy designed to average out seasonal fluctuations in assemblages (Scott and Medioli, 1978;Horton and Edwards, 2003). This sampling strategy may miss the contribution of infaunal species that live at greater depths (Goldstein and Harben, 1993;Hayward et al, 2014;Chen et al, 2020), but ensures that significant changes in sea level have not occurred during the accumulation of the sediment. We added a Rose Bengal-ethanol solution to each sample within 24 h of collection to differentiate between living and dead foraminifera (Walton, 1952) and classed those with staining around the aperture and in the final chamber as living (Figueira, 2012).…”
Section: Modern Sample Collection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ammobaculites and Haplophragmoides predominate in this area, indicating a strong organic flux and extremely dysaerobic conditions caused by freshwater discharge. This area is classified as oxygendepleted environment (shallow to deep littoral) [60,[68][69][70] and [71].…”
Section: P1c Subzonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where possible, a count of at least 200 individuals per sample was taken (e.g. Chen et al 2020;Figueira & Hayward, 2014); however, where counts were less than 200, the entire sample was counted.…”
Section: Laboratory Processing Of Foraminiferal Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We favour PAM over alternative hierarchical clustering methods, such as k-means, as it is considered more statistically robust (Kemp et al 2012). The PAM method minimizes a sum of dissimilarities which means there is no requirement for clusters to have a certain size and structure (Chen et al 2020;Kaufman & Rousseeuw, 1990;Kemp et al 2012). We determine the optimal number of clusters using the average silhouette method, where a silhouette width (Si) of 1 indicates a sample to be perfectly assigned to the cluster, while -1 indicates incorrect assignment (Kaufman & Rousseeuw, 1990).…”
Section: Clustering and Ordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%