2008
DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2008.10817520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salt Bridges and Conformational Flexibility: Effect on Protein Stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the crystal structure of the AHL pore exhibited 297 salt bridges while the MD generated ensemble had an average of 346 ± 12 salt bridges, indicating a 17% increase. Similar observations have been made for other systems – salt bridges which were previously not present in the crystal structures of proteins were observed to be formed during the course of an MD simulation (Karshikoff & Jelesarov, 2008). Figure 3 d shows that the number of intra-protein hydrogen bonds in the AHL crystal structure and the MD generated ensemble were 986 and 1053 ± 25 respectively, and that in the AHL crystal structure and the MD generated ensemble were 467 and 651 ± 19 respectively, indicating a 6% and 39% increase for the MD simulated conformations of ClyA and AHL, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Similarly, the crystal structure of the AHL pore exhibited 297 salt bridges while the MD generated ensemble had an average of 346 ± 12 salt bridges, indicating a 17% increase. Similar observations have been made for other systems – salt bridges which were previously not present in the crystal structures of proteins were observed to be formed during the course of an MD simulation (Karshikoff & Jelesarov, 2008). Figure 3 d shows that the number of intra-protein hydrogen bonds in the AHL crystal structure and the MD generated ensemble were 986 and 1053 ± 25 respectively, and that in the AHL crystal structure and the MD generated ensemble were 467 and 651 ± 19 respectively, indicating a 6% and 39% increase for the MD simulated conformations of ClyA and AHL, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Due to the size of proteins and their complexity, this is mainly the inherently directional nature of these interactions [49] that distinguishes HMI from isotropic (non-directional) interactions. Hydrophobic (Van der Waals), dispersive (London), and steric (6/12 potentials) are isotropic while hydrogen bonding, Ar-H [19], and salt bridge interactions [4,40,50], all of which we are including as HMIs, are directional [5,46]). Because we analyzed distances between 2 and 6 Å, we were able to largely obviate the need for a specific distance metric, thereby avoiding some controversies in this area as this length regime includes everything from long covalent disulfide bonds to water-mediated hydrogen bonds [15].…”
Section: Donors Directmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, our method is not without its limitations. This model is simply too simple to differentiate hydrogen bonds from salt bridges, which tend to have only slightly shorter interaction distances [40,50], and we focus exclusively on intra-chain interactions [59]. It is also worth noting that the ambiguity present in several atom types (e.g., carboxylates of aspartate and glutamate, or histidine nitrogen atoms) necessitates ambiguity in donor and acceptor assignments, and also ambiguity in finding interactions between atoms which may in their natural state be matched donors or acceptors.…”
Section: Donors Directmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salt bridges are formed between two oppositely charged amino acid residues that is, Asp or Glu with Arg, Lys, or His, that are within a 4.0 Å distance . Depending upon the flexibility of protein in solution, the disruption and reformation of salt bridges occur . Salt Bridge analysis was performed using VMD plugin .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%