81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019 2019
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201900878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salt Body Inversion Using an Optimal Transport of the Preconditioned Matching Filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, W 2 denotes the Wasserstein distance [1]. The resulting OTMF misfit in Equation 3 can overcome the cycle-skipping effectively as demonstrated by [6].…”
Section: A Robust Misfit Function By Optimal Transport Of the Matching Filter (Otmf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, W 2 denotes the Wasserstein distance [1]. The resulting OTMF misfit in Equation 3 can overcome the cycle-skipping effectively as demonstrated by [6].…”
Section: A Robust Misfit Function By Optimal Transport Of the Matching Filter (Otmf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional industry practice with salt regions is to apply the migrate-pick-flood flow, which is time consuming and prone to error as it requires human interpretation and decision making (Dellinger et al, 2017). For more automatic inversion with less human intervention: Ovcharenko et al (2018) used a variance-based interpolation to process the conventional FWI updates; Sun and Alkhalifah (2019b) proposed to use more robust objective functions such as the optimal-transport when inverting for the salt. Other studies suggested to apply an automatic flooding by constraining the inversion using a Hing loss (Esser et al, 2016) or regularizing it as a post-inversion process (Kalita et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%