2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salt and Pepper for Point-of-Care Diagnostics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted, that compared to other label-free sensors developed for the simultaneous determination of the two-analytes, the sensor developed exceeded in performance either with respect to detection sensitivity or the duration of the assay. There are only two publications regarding the simultaneous determination of CRP and D-dimer with label-free biosensors: the first employing a surface acoustic wave sensor (SAW) complemented with a fluidic that allows detection in sequence of the targeted markers [ 46 ], and the second targeting to a Point-of-Care system based on reflectometric interference spectroscopy (RIfS) [ 47 ]. Compared to the first system, the WLRS sensor has approximately 5-and 40-times lower quantification limits for CRP and D-dimer, respectively; however, the assay time of the proposed sensor is approximately 3-times longer.…”
Section: System Development and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted, that compared to other label-free sensors developed for the simultaneous determination of the two-analytes, the sensor developed exceeded in performance either with respect to detection sensitivity or the duration of the assay. There are only two publications regarding the simultaneous determination of CRP and D-dimer with label-free biosensors: the first employing a surface acoustic wave sensor (SAW) complemented with a fluidic that allows detection in sequence of the targeted markers [ 46 ], and the second targeting to a Point-of-Care system based on reflectometric interference spectroscopy (RIfS) [ 47 ]. Compared to the first system, the WLRS sensor has approximately 5-and 40-times lower quantification limits for CRP and D-dimer, respectively; however, the assay time of the proposed sensor is approximately 3-times longer.…”
Section: System Development and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%