2008
DOI: 10.26686/vuwlr.v38i4.5544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salmond, Necessity, and the State

Abstract: This article explores the varying approaches of Sir John Salmond as government adviser, judicial office, and legal theorist, to the State and the circumstances under which it might act under "necessity" in disregard of law. An epilogue provides the writer's own attempt in formal advice to delineate the boundaries of the doctrine in modern jurisprudence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since for centuries, the central figure of the English legal system was the judge, who was not just the enforcer of the law, but the author of the law. The perception of law as a judicial tradition, developing evolutionarily and closely linked to the historical development of English society, was a deeply rooted view of the professional legal consciousness of English lawyers, and it is these traditional views that found expression in the legal teaching of the New Zealand lawyer, civil servant and judge John William Salmond (Frame, 1995).…”
Section: The First Ideological Background Of Early Legal Positivism In Englandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since for centuries, the central figure of the English legal system was the judge, who was not just the enforcer of the law, but the author of the law. The perception of law as a judicial tradition, developing evolutionarily and closely linked to the historical development of English society, was a deeply rooted view of the professional legal consciousness of English lawyers, and it is these traditional views that found expression in the legal teaching of the New Zealand lawyer, civil servant and judge John William Salmond (Frame, 1995).…”
Section: The First Ideological Background Of Early Legal Positivism In Englandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…561 From 1907 to 1920, Salmond was the primary overseer of the exact wording of most government legislation, wielding significant influence on New Zealand law. 562 By this time, New Zealand had already established a much stronger central executive than the United States. Whereas the American federal system was designed to limit the power of central government, the constitution of the New Zealand state is constructed in a way that allows cabinet to pass interventionist laws with little opposition: Seddon established the legislature as subordinate to the executive, and by the end of the First World War "government by order-in-council" was an "established procedure".…”
Section: Policing and Punishment In Wartimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…565 Salmond intended to make Maori land claims "political" -to be decided upon by Parliament, not the courts. 566 Three years later, these clauses were tested when Te Arawa took their claim of fishing rights over Lake Rotorua to the Court of Appeal, arguing that the bed of the lake was "customary Native land in respect of which the Native Land Court has jurisdiction to make freehold orders under the Native Land Act, 1909" -that the "customary and exclusive rights of fishing" in the lake, held by Te Arawa, were "capable in some manner of legal recognition and enforcement" by the Native Land Court. 567 Salmond argued that sections 84 and 85 of the Native Land Act meant that this was not the case: "the contention of the Crown is that the Natives may go to the Native Land Court and ask to have their customary rights investigated and determined, but if the Crown claims the land is Crown land then the Court's jurisdiction is ousted."…”
Section: Policing and Punishment In Wartimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation