1992
DOI: 10.1136/adc.67.6.724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salivary IgA antigliadin antibody as a marker for coeliac disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…28-34 AGA detection had generally low sensitivity, and when used to screen children with CD, also a limited specificity. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] IgA EMA were evaluated in saliva fluid in two studies performed with indirect immunofluorescence methods. 33,34 Lätheenoja et al 33 failed to detect a salivary EMA immune response in all the subjects with CD investigated at disease diagnosis; they postulated that salivary IgA EMA are not produced locally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28-34 AGA detection had generally low sensitivity, and when used to screen children with CD, also a limited specificity. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] IgA EMA were evaluated in saliva fluid in two studies performed with indirect immunofluorescence methods. 33,34 Lätheenoja et al 33 failed to detect a salivary EMA immune response in all the subjects with CD investigated at disease diagnosis; they postulated that salivary IgA EMA are not produced locally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,[25][26][27] The most sensitive assays to detect tTG-Abs were those using human recombinant tTG in a fluid-phase radioimmunoassay (RIA) format. 26,27 Attempts have been made in assaying CD-related Ab in saliva, [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] which are easily obtained by noninvasive techniques, bypassing blood sample collection. However, the proposed salivary assays were not accurate enough, suggesting that saliva is not suitable for CD screening…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). In two studies employing samples of unstimulated whole saliva, the discrimination of confirmed celiac patients was quite satisfactory, 99 or even better than by measurement of IgA antibodies in serum. 100 However, comparable studies employing stimulated parotid secretion showed only little, 101 or virtually no 102 elevation of IgA antibody levels to gliadin in contrast to the results obtained with serum (FIG.…”
Section: Celiac Diseasementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, the production of IgA antibodies to gluten (gliadin) that is induced in the gut of patients with coeliac disease, is reflected as diagnostic IgA titers in whole saliva (86, 87). Nevertheless, in subjects immunized orally with a cholera toxin (CT) B subunit–whole-cell Vibrio cholerae vaccine, the specific IgA antibody detection sensitivity in whole saliva was not better than in serum and only approximately 50% of that in intestinal lavage (88).…”
Section: Homing Of Activated B Cells To Salivary Glandsmentioning
confidence: 99%