2018
DOI: 10.1002/lary.27502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saliva Pepsin Detection and Proton Pump Inhibitor Response in Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Abstract: Objectives/Hypothesis To evaluate the prediction value of saliva pepsin detection for an 8‐week proton pump inhibitor (PPI) response in patients with a Reflux Symptoms Index (RSI) score ≥13, which indicates possible laryngopharyngeal reflux. Study Design Prospective individual single‐cohort study. Methods Patients were recruited who had experienced chronic laryngopharyngeal symptoms (RSI score ≥13) for more than 3 months after excluding other etiologies. The patients received PPI (40 mg of esomeprazole once da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(64 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Salivary pepsin level can quickly distinguish true reflux with non-reflux diseases, and is important for the diagnosis of GERD patients with predominant respiratory symptoms. [14][15][16][17]26 In this study, the positive rate of detecting EES was 68.2%, which was consistent with the observation of a previous study, 24 suggesting that salivary pepsin is of certain diagnostic value for the diagnosis of EES. In addition, the salivary pepsin level and positive rate in the BE group were significantly higher than those in the HC group in the present study, suggesting that pepsin reflux does play a significant role in the process of BE formation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…25 Salivary pepsin level can quickly distinguish true reflux with non-reflux diseases, and is important for the diagnosis of GERD patients with predominant respiratory symptoms. [14][15][16][17]26 In this study, the positive rate of detecting EES was 68.2%, which was consistent with the observation of a previous study, 24 suggesting that salivary pepsin is of certain diagnostic value for the diagnosis of EES. In addition, the salivary pepsin level and positive rate in the BE group were significantly higher than those in the HC group in the present study, suggesting that pepsin reflux does play a significant role in the process of BE formation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…41,46 The current basic principle of drug therapy against GERD is to reduce gastric acid secretion and indirectly reduce the production of pepsin, thereby reducing the amount of gastric acid and pepsin refluxed to the esophagus, throat and other parts, resulting in significantly reduced clinical symptoms and the mucosa damages to the reflux site in GERD patients. 6,14,15 This study showed that for NERD patients, the positive rate of salivary pepsin test was significantly higher than the pathologic reflux as determined by 24-hour pH monitoring (71.9% vs 43.8%), suggesting that salivary pepsin test can complement or combine with the 24-hour pH monitoring and improve the efficiency in the diagnosis of GERD. A recent study showed that 24-hour pH monitoring was less sensitive in the diagnosis of NERD, 47 which was consistent with our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Acidic event consisted of a gaseous or liquid reflux with a pH ≤ 4.0, whereas nonacidic event was a gaseous or liquid reflux with a pH >4.0. According to a recent study that defined normative data of MII‐pH in LPR, the LPR diagnosis was based on the occurrence of ≥ one proximal episode . GERD was defined as a length of time >4.0% of the 24‐hour recording spent below pH 4.0 or a DeMeester score >14.72.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%