2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saliva as a possible tool for the SARS-CoV-2 detection: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some recent studies have shown similar results to ours, there are also other studies suggesting that saliva samples are compatible with the results of nasopharyngeal samples starting from the early period of the disease ( Azzi et al, 2020 , To et al, 2020 , Pasomsub et al, 2020 , Kam et al, 2020 ; Chong et al, 2020 , Jamal et al, 2020 ; Kim et al, 2020 ; Kojima et al, 2020 ; Yokota et al, 2020 , Yee et al, 2020 ; Santos et al, 2020 ). Some researchers suggest that saliva sampling can allow for an efficient, relatively inexpensive surveillance system however, they also point to the need for pilot studies ( Fogarty et al, 2020 , Medeiros da Silva et al, 2020 ). In this study, we consecutively recruited 200 inpatients who presented with clinical signs compatible with Covid-19 and at initial testing 98 of them revealed SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR positivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some recent studies have shown similar results to ours, there are also other studies suggesting that saliva samples are compatible with the results of nasopharyngeal samples starting from the early period of the disease ( Azzi et al, 2020 , To et al, 2020 , Pasomsub et al, 2020 , Kam et al, 2020 ; Chong et al, 2020 , Jamal et al, 2020 ; Kim et al, 2020 ; Kojima et al, 2020 ; Yokota et al, 2020 , Yee et al, 2020 ; Santos et al, 2020 ). Some researchers suggest that saliva sampling can allow for an efficient, relatively inexpensive surveillance system however, they also point to the need for pilot studies ( Fogarty et al, 2020 , Medeiros da Silva et al, 2020 ). In this study, we consecutively recruited 200 inpatients who presented with clinical signs compatible with Covid-19 and at initial testing 98 of them revealed SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR positivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, inconsistency in collecting respiratory samples also affects the final diagnosis. Less invasive samples such as saliva is being evaluated and the results are encouraging ( 38 ). While isothermal assays offer faster diagnosis, many of the limitations associated with rRT-PCR remain unresolved because of the similar nature of the sample and guiding principle of diagnosis at the center of it, i.e.…”
Section: Current Challengeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since saliva is easier to collect than either swabs or blood, its accessibility makes it an ideal biofluid for widespread diagnostic use. Research is still ongoing regarding how well saliva correlates to different types of swabs in terms of sensitivity of viral RNA detection [30][31][32]35,36 . This will depend largely on several factors such as patient selection, sample collection, and RNA extraction methodology.…”
Section: Rt-qpcr Tests For Sars-cov2 Mostly Analyze Rna From Nasal Swmentioning
confidence: 99%