“…However, we have also compared our method with seven deep-learning-based top-down methods because they are central to a lot of high-end innovations in recent times. Center prior, color dissimilarity, spatial distance COV [98] Local color contrast, center prior SUN [100] The local intensity and color features, feature space MRBF [7] Boundary connectivity, foreground prior Region by SLIC algorithm DCLC [36] Diffusion-based using manifold ranking, compactness local contrast, center prior MCVS [44] Background prior, foreground prior, and contrast features CSV [56] Global color spatial distribution, object position prior HDCT [67] Learning-based approach, global and local color contrast features, location, histogram, texture, and shape features FCB [68] Foreground and background cues, center prior MC [80] Boundary prior, graph-based, Markov random walk MR [83] Boundary prior, graph-based manifold ranking DGL [84] Graph-based, boundary prior FBSS [94] Boundary, texture, color, and contrast priors DSR [106] Background prior MAP [108] Boundary prior, graph-based, Markov absorption probabilities BGFG [109] Background and foreground prior GR [113] Convex-hull-based center prior, contrast and smoothness prior, graph-based BPFS [140] Global color contrast, background prior, and foreground seeds RPC [66] Color contrast, center prior Regions by graph-based segmentation DRFI [85] Color and texture contrast features, backgrounds features CNS [70] Surroundedness and global color contrast cues Regional histogram of color name space) SIM [75] Center In this study, we run the source codes of the methods of AC, BGFG, CNS, DCLC, DGL, DRFI, GB, GMR, HDCT, IT, MAP, MR, and RPC with their default parameters. The implementations of salient object detection methods in [63] with default parameters were employed to obtain the saliency maps of CA, COV, DSR, FES, GR, MC, SEG, SeR, SR, SUN, and SWD.…”