2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11633-020-1246-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saliency Detection via Manifold Ranking Based on Robust Foreground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, DGL and DRFI improved their performances for this category of images. The deformed smoothness constraint-based manifold ranking approach used by the DGL method has helped to improve performance for this image category compared to other manifold ranking-based methods such as MR. As stated in [7], results obtained for MR have demonstrated poor performance on complex background images when compared to other categories of images. The SIM again scored the lowest performance on this category of images.…”
Section: Salient Objects With Complex Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, DGL and DRFI improved their performances for this category of images. The deformed smoothness constraint-based manifold ranking approach used by the DGL method has helped to improve performance for this image category compared to other manifold ranking-based methods such as MR. As stated in [7], results obtained for MR have demonstrated poor performance on complex background images when compared to other categories of images. The SIM again scored the lowest performance on this category of images.…”
Section: Salient Objects With Complex Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, we have also compared our method with seven deep-learning-based top-down methods because they are central to a lot of high-end innovations in recent times. Center prior, color dissimilarity, spatial distance COV [98] Local color contrast, center prior SUN [100] The local intensity and color features, feature space MRBF [7] Boundary connectivity, foreground prior Region by SLIC algorithm DCLC [36] Diffusion-based using manifold ranking, compactness local contrast, center prior MCVS [44] Background prior, foreground prior, and contrast features CSV [56] Global color spatial distribution, object position prior HDCT [67] Learning-based approach, global and local color contrast features, location, histogram, texture, and shape features FCB [68] Foreground and background cues, center prior MC [80] Boundary prior, graph-based, Markov random walk MR [83] Boundary prior, graph-based manifold ranking DGL [84] Graph-based, boundary prior FBSS [94] Boundary, texture, color, and contrast priors DSR [106] Background prior MAP [108] Boundary prior, graph-based, Markov absorption probabilities BGFG [109] Background and foreground prior GR [113] Convex-hull-based center prior, contrast and smoothness prior, graph-based BPFS [140] Global color contrast, background prior, and foreground seeds RPC [66] Color contrast, center prior Regions by graph-based segmentation DRFI [85] Color and texture contrast features, backgrounds features CNS [70] Surroundedness and global color contrast cues Regional histogram of color name space) SIM [75] Center In this study, we run the source codes of the methods of AC, BGFG, CNS, DCLC, DGL, DRFI, GB, GMR, HDCT, IT, MAP, MR, and RPC with their default parameters. The implementations of salient object detection methods in [63] with default parameters were employed to obtain the saliency maps of CA, COV, DSR, FES, GR, MC, SEG, SeR, SR, SUN, and SWD.…”
Section: Methods Comparedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations