Saisir, décrire, déchiffrer : les mises en texte du social sous la monarchie de Juillet

Lyon-Caen, Judith

doi:10.3917/rhis.042.0303

Cited by 16 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Insbesondere die unzähligen und häufig kurzlebigen Zeitungs-und Zeitschriftenprojekte der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts sind als Treiber der Konsolidierung und Verbreitung soziographischer 3 Formen zu verstehen (Lauster 2007;Lyon-Caen 2004;Porter 2003). Dieser Popularisierungseffekt 13 wurde durch die Herstellung preiswerter Nachdrucke speziell für Vertreter*innen der mittleren und unteren sozialen Schichten sowie angesichts einer breiten Verfügbarkeit von Druckmedien in Lesehallen, Cafés und Bildungseinrichtungen weiter verstärkt.…”

Section: Soziale Neugier Als Mediales Phänomenunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Populäre Genres als soziographische Wissensformate im 19. Jahrhundert

Schwab

2021

Skizzen, Romane, Karikaturen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This introductory article contextualizes the volume's contributions within an interdisciplinary and transcultural historiography of social knowledge production. From the beginning of the nineteenth century, a growing desire to comprehend the transformations in the social, economic, and political world promoted the consolidation of diverse sociographic genres. From Munich to Mexico City, sketches of manners, travel accounts, social novels, genre paintings, and illustrated periodicals celebrated considerable success on an increasingly commercialized market of print and arts. According to their specific medial conditions, these forms tracked the changes in everyday practices, clothing habits, and urban infrastructures. The new empiricist approach to human nature and environments through description and contextualization had clearly been encouraged by political and epistemic shifts, which had favored both the success of realist genres and the natural sciences. The volume's contributions explore the connections between the massification and diversification of audience-oriented print products and the increased interest in social expressions and dynamics. By examining the knowledge practices of selection, classification, aestheticization, and ideologization, they uncover the connections between popular genres of sociography and »academic« forms of social research, which, by the end of the century, became established in sociological and anthropological associations and university departments. The multifaceted collection of articles reveals alternative strands of early ethnographic-sociological knowledge production and provides perspectives for a history of social knowledge beyond disciplinary, national, and genre-related methodologies.

show abstract

Section: Soziale Neugier Als Mediales Phänomenunclassified

“…zum Wissenstransfer zwischen Literatur, Publizistik und Statistik im 19. Jahrhundert auchLyon-Caen 2004;Fowler 2001;Le Men 1993.…”

unclassified

Populäre Genres als soziographische Wissensformate im 19. Jahrhundert

Schwab

2021

Skizzen, Romane, Karikaturen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Plus conscients des débats qui les entourent, ces deux groupes utilisent donc cette compréhension à défendre leurs intérêts propres en réagissant aux 54 Citée par ROSANVALLON, 1998, 288. Cf. sa présentation de l'exposition consacrée par le musée d'Orsay à la série Les Français peints par eux-mêmes en 1993, in LE MEN, 1993 55 LYON-CAEN, 2004. 56 KARILA-COHEN, 2008 idées et aux initiatives politiques qui semblent les menacer.…”

Section: « Les Détails Qui Trahissent L'esprit Public » : L'observati...unclassified

La formation d'un savoir composite : les enquêtes sur l'opinion sous la monarchie constitutionnelle (1814-1848)

Karila-Cohen¹

2008

Revue d'Histoire Des Sciences Humaines

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Éditions Sciences Humaines. © Éditions Sciences Humaines. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.

show abstract

“…So the emergence of the working class as a political question after the revolution of 1830 went together with debates about what labour was, as a distinctive social activity, as well as many discourses, pamphlets, articles and studies about workers, not to mention the burgeoning literature depicting them (Perrot 1972;Lyon-Caen 2004;Kalifa 2010). These debates were quite unprecedented in France: while the word labour (travail) had always been part of French language, especially since the 17 th century when travailler replaced ouvrer and labourer (Febvre 1948), it was then just slowly emerging as a concept, defining a unified activity that could be studied as such (Méda & Vendramin 2013: 7-54).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptualisations of Labour and the Making of the French Working Class in the 1830s

Hayat¹

2022

Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The emergence of the working class as a unified subject in France at the beginning of the 19th century was linked to transformations in the conceptualisation of work. At the beginning of the July Monarchy, two distinct conceptions of labour emerged within the nascent liberal and socialist movements. What they had in common was that they saw the working class as a single, unified entity, over and above the trade differences that had organised labour before the 1789 Revolution. But they differed in important respects. For the liberals, labour, as a social activity, put workers at risk of being influenced by immoral doctrines and examples of vice. In contrast to property, which led the middle classes to political moderation, work was seen as potentially radicalising workers, who therefore had to be kept under the supervision of the state and employers. For socialists, on the other hand, labour was an all-encompassing activity that should make the working class a hegemonic subject.

show abstract

Saisir, décrire, déchiffrer : les mises en texte du social sous la monarchie de Juillet

Cited by 16 publications

References 1 publication

Populäre Genres als soziographische Wissensformate im 19. Jahrhundert

Populäre Genres als soziographische Wissensformate im 19. Jahrhundert

La formation d'un savoir composite : les enquêtes sur l'opinion sous la monarchie constitutionnelle (1814-1848)

Conceptualisations of Labour and the Making of the French Working Class in the 1830s

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About