2016
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-95022016000200012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sagittal Otolith Morphology of Sharpsnout Seabream Diplodus puntazzo (Walbaum, 1792) in the Aegean Sea

Abstract: SUMMARY:The morphology, biometry and shape indices of the left and right sagittal otoliths were studied for sharpsnout seabream, Diplodus puntazzo species from Aegean Sea. The shape, sulcus acusticus shape, proximal and distal surfaces, anterior and posterior regions of left and right sagittal otoliths for a total of 52 D. puntazzo were analyzed. The morphometric measurements such as weight, length, width, area and perimeter were recorded for each pair of sagittal otoliths of the sharpsnout seabream. The shape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, it was usually reported that the otolith shape is species‐specific for fish species and that in the normal case the otolith shape is consistent within the same species (Bostanci et al, 2016; Kontaş et al, 2020; Tuset et al, 2008; Yedier, 2021b; Zengin et al, 2015). However, in the present study, it was determined that the blind and eyed side otoliths of the same species showed statistical differences in the morphometric and contour shape analysis results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In previous studies, it was usually reported that the otolith shape is species‐specific for fish species and that in the normal case the otolith shape is consistent within the same species (Bostanci et al, 2016; Kontaş et al, 2020; Tuset et al, 2008; Yedier, 2021b; Zengin et al, 2015). However, in the present study, it was determined that the blind and eyed side otoliths of the same species showed statistical differences in the morphometric and contour shape analysis results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, similar growth patterns characterized the species in the two study areas. Variation in otolith morphology and shape is known to be related to genetic and/or environmental factors such as temperature, salinity, depth and food availability (Campana and Casselman, 1993;Lombarte and Lleonart, 1993;Capoccioni et al, 2011;Bostanci et al, 2016;Smolinski et al, 2020;Nazir and Khan, 2021). In addition, Bose et al (2020) suggest that the otolith width is highly influenced by selected environmental factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%