“Sage on the stage or guide on the side”—Undergraduate nursing students’ experiences and expectations of bioscience tutors in a blended learning curriculum: A qualitative study

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study sought to explore undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions of the role and value of their bioscience tutors in a blended learning curriculum. Background Blended learning approaches typically have reduced face‐to‐face contact with tutors—particularly in bioscience subjects which nursing students have traditionally found difficult, and the move to more web‐based learning resources may compound this difficulty. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Methods This qualitative study was conducted with 19 undergraduate nursing students enrolled in bioscience subjects, at a large university in outer metropolitan Sydney, Australia in 2016. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted over the telephone or face‐to‐face. Duration of interviews ranged from 13 to 71 min. Results were thematically analysed. EQUATOR guidelines for qualitative research (COREQ) applied. Results Two main themes with accompanying sub‐themes were identified. The first theme identified the importance of the tutor in bioscience, including their qualities, expertise and contextualisation of learning. The second theme provided insights into students’ perceptions of what they considered good and poor approaches to learning. Conclusions This study has clearly shown that while nursing students appreciated the flexibility offered by the online component of a blended learning curriculum, they still wanted an experienced bioscience tutor with clinical experience for their face‐to‐face classes. While the tutor was seen as crucial to providing clarification and context for content that was often challenging, they also played a key role in engaging and motivating students and creating a learning environment where students felt empowered to ask questions and debate issues with their peers. Given the increased use of online learning, further research could determine if the current study findings are also applicable in nonscience areas of study. Relevance to clinical practice The importance of students having a sound understanding of the biosciences for safe, effective clinical practice cannot be underestimated.

Studying physiology within a flipped classroom: The importance of on‐campus activities for nursing students’ experiences of mastery

“…Teaching bioscience to nursing students in large classes can be challenging due to students’ lack of confidence (Bakon et al., 2016), their struggles with off‐campus preparations and the resulting variation in their level of preparedness, and their preference for a teacher‐centred approach (Bingen et al, 2019; Koch et al., 2020; O’Flaherty & Phillips, 2015). Our findings indicated that struggling students could benefit from more in‐class lectures to build their foundation of knowledge.…”

Fostering ICT Competencies in Blended Learning: Role of Curriculum Content, Material, and Teaching Strategies

“…The understanding about the curriculum content in blended learning has been developed in previous studies such as curriculum content in the teaching-learning process considered important facts, principles, and concepts that can be knowledge, skills, attitude, and values that students expose to learn (Lunenburg, 2011a , b ). Koch et al ( 2020 ) identified the significance of the blended learning curriculum of bioscience and provided students' insights into what they reflected as good and inadequate approaches to learning. Yu and Du ( 2019 ) explained the delivery of the curriculum content through tremendous advancements in technology that have become central points in modern higher education for both face-to-face learning and online learning.…”

Anticipated acceptability of blended learning among lay health care workers in Malawi: A qualitative analysis guided by the Technology Acceptance Model (Preprint)

“…Hence, participants preferred to also have a face-to-face portion to resolve their unanswered questions and allow them to practice new skills. The desire for face-to-face encounters has also been highlighted in clinical training programs [29,35]. These findings around interest in both modalities reinforce the value of blended approaches [36] in which participants experience the flexibility of digital self-training and engagement and interactivity in face-to-face sessions.…”