Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Industrial and Food Crops 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-23265-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Breeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, qualitative morphological traits were either not measured (Amini et al, 2008;Ebrahimi et al, 2017;Sabzalian et al, 2009;Talebi & Abhari, 2016), ignored during statistical analysis (Ali, Yilmaz, et al, 2020;Dwivedi et al, 2005), or handled wrongly, as if they were quantitative (Khan et al, 2009;Kumar et al, 2016). Nevertheless, it is well known that genetic diversity of crop species is better assessed and exploited by combining phenotypic descriptors and molecular DNA markers (Golkar & Karimi, 2019). The molecular markers reflect differences in the nucleotide sequence of genotypes, whereas morphological traits (phenotype) indicate the expression of genotype, environment, and their interaction (Adugna et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, qualitative morphological traits were either not measured (Amini et al, 2008;Ebrahimi et al, 2017;Sabzalian et al, 2009;Talebi & Abhari, 2016), ignored during statistical analysis (Ali, Yilmaz, et al, 2020;Dwivedi et al, 2005), or handled wrongly, as if they were quantitative (Khan et al, 2009;Kumar et al, 2016). Nevertheless, it is well known that genetic diversity of crop species is better assessed and exploited by combining phenotypic descriptors and molecular DNA markers (Golkar & Karimi, 2019). The molecular markers reflect differences in the nucleotide sequence of genotypes, whereas morphological traits (phenotype) indicate the expression of genotype, environment, and their interaction (Adugna et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower amount of linoleic acid in safflower seed oil was determined by Celenk, Gumus¸, Argon, Buyukhelvacigil, and Karasulu [ 27 ]; they reported 58.2% linoleic acid in the oil. Recently, a safflower breeding effort has led to high oleic fatty acids in safflower hybrid selections [ 28 ]. These plants are more suitable for biobased applications (such as the production of biolubricants, bioherbicides, bioplastics, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through selection and/ or hybridization with local lines, this material can then be used for breeding in other countries. Safflower cultivars were produced in the twentieth century in the United States, Canada, and Argentina, using material imported from India, Russia, and Turkey [93]. The most complicated variables in safflower are seed yield and oil content, and selection for these traits is impeded by substantial genetic-environmental interactions.…”
Section: Crop Improvement Of Safflowermentioning
confidence: 99%