Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects

Aminbakhsh, Saman; Gunduz, Murat; Sönmez, Rifat

doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2013.05.003

Cited by 323 publications

(179 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

166

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Namun, keberagaman latar belakang para pakar dengan kompetensi dan keilmuwan yang berbeda-beda juga dapat melahirkan keputusan yang beragam pula. Oleh karena itu, berbagai metode telah berkembang untuk merumuskan akumulasi pendapat para pakar ini dalam menyajikan Yoon, 1981;Wang 2011;Behzadiana et al 2012), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Ishizakaa 2012;Aminbakhsh, 2013;Saaty, 2013), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Afshari et al 2010;Jain dan Raj, 2013;Salehi dan Izadikhah, 2014), Weighted Product Model (WPM) (Wang, 2011;Jain dan Raj, 2013), Analytic Network Process (ANP) (Yang et al 2008;Saaty, 2013;Aragones-Beltran et al 2014), Multi Atribut Utility Theory (MAUT) (Velasquez dan Hester, 2013;Claudio et al 2014), Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) (Putra et al 2015), Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations (PROMETHEE) (Hopfe, 2009;Velasquez dan Hester, 2013), Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) (Lotfi et al 2011;Velasquez dan Hester, 2013), Value Analysis (VA) and Value Engineering (VE) (SAVE, 2007;Miles, 2015), Visekriterijumslca Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) (Liu dan Wang, 2011;Mardani et al 2016;), Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) (Jayalakshmi dan Pramod, 2015;Poduval et al 2015), Bayesian Analysis (BA) (Andraszewicz et al 2015;Cho, 1998) dan lainnya. Setiap metode memiliki filosofinya tersendiri dan tidak ada satu lebih benar dari lainnya (Tamiz et al 1998 Thompson et al 2006;Kao, 2010).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Perbandingan Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan Multi-Kriteria Antara Metode Eckenrode dengan Metode Fuzzy Eckenrode pada Kinerja Agroindustri

Fadhil

Maarif

Bantacut

et al. 2017

JMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multi-criteria decision-making system has evolved with various methods. One method that is still being used today is the Eckenrode method. This study aims to compare the methods used in multi-criteria decision-making i.e. between the Eckenrode method and PENDAHULUANTeknik pengambilan keputusan terutama dalam menentukan suatu kebijakan yang akan dipilih atau prioritas dari sejumlah alternatif kebijakan yang dapat dilakukan, senantiasa memerlukan suatu metode tertentu. Dalam menghadapi hal tersebut para pakar mencoba menemukan cara-cara efektif dalam penentuannya, apalagi terkait dengan waktu dan pilihanpilihan yang terkadang terlalu sulit untuk diputuskan dengan cepat. Pendapat para pakar selalu menjadi bagian dari alternatif yang dapat dipertimbangkan dari solusi-solusi yang ditawarkan. Namun, keberagaman latar belakang para pakar dengan kompetensi dan keilmuwan yang berbeda-beda juga dapat melahirkan keputusan yang beragam pula. Oleh karena itu, berbagai metode telah berkembang untuk merumuskan akumulasi pendapat para pakar ini dalam menyajikan

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Perbandingan Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan Multi-Kriteria Antara Metode Eckenrode dengan Metode Fuzzy Eckenrode pada Kinerja Agroindustri

Fadhil

Maarif

Bantacut

et al. 2017

JMA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The major advantage of AHP is its capability to check and reduce the inconsistency of expert judgments. While reducing bias in the decision making process, this method provides group decision making through the consensus [24]. Phase 2 of the research is to analyze the relationships between these factors and the likelihood of an accident using Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) methods.…”

Section: Framework For Model Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relative Factors Shaping Construction Workers' Behaviors and Leading to Accidents

Sooksil¹,

Benjaoran²

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Most construction workers' behaviors are shaped by task objective constraints and their capability during the operation. This research describes the construction workers' behaviors are an interaction between the task demand and the worker capability. The relative factors that influence construction workers' behaviors have been determined through the Delphi process and Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP). The panel participated in these processes was represented by 9 safety experts who were specialized in high-rise building construction. Results of the analysis showed that 23 task demand factors and 12 worker capability factors were determined by 2 rounds of the Delphi process under the expert's consensus. The weights of these factors were determined by utilizing the AHP. The most weighted factor of the task demand was the Societal and Environmental Impact Awareness Factor. The Foreman's Communication Ability Factor was the dominant weighted factor of the capability. The factors and their relative weights can guide practitioners to manage the project resources safely and efficiently.

show abstract

“…For example, in operations management, AHP can be used for "make or buy" decisions, project risk analysis [22], supplier selection [23] and strategic solutions for alternate energy/emissions management [24].…”

Section: B Advantages and Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An AHP Model towards an Agile Enterprise

Marhraoui¹,

Manouar²

2017

ijacsa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Companies are facing different challenges in order to adapt to their environmental context. They should be aware of the changes on the social, political, ecological and economical levels. Moreover, they should act in an efficient and rapid manner by leveraging new and reconfigurable resources. Organizational agility is the firm's key dynamic capability which enables it to deal with changes and exploit them as opportunities. Firms' objective is thus to attain a higher degree of agility which can help them to perform durably. In this article, a new model based on analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is proposed. This can help companies to raise their agility level by deploying the most suitable agility enablers which can be either general or specific when related to information technologies. They can thus develop the most appropriate strategy towards agility regarding their internal and external contexts.

show abstract

Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects

Cited by 323 publications

References 13 publications

Perbandingan Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan Multi-Kriteria Antara Metode Eckenrode dengan Metode Fuzzy Eckenrode pada Kinerja Agroindustri

Perbandingan Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan Multi-Kriteria Antara Metode Eckenrode dengan Metode Fuzzy Eckenrode pada Kinerja Agroindustri

The Relative Factors Shaping Construction Workers' Behaviors and Leading to Accidents

An AHP Model towards an Agile Enterprise

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About