Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99582-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety-Related Risks and Opportunities of Key Design-Aspects for Industrial Human-Robot Collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As many types of human-robot interactions, Kaiser et al describe scenarios of co-existence [28]: (1) Encapsulation, with physically fenced robot work areas, (2) co-existence, without fencing but separation of human and robot work areas, (3) cooperation, with shared work areas but without simultaneous operation in the shared area, and (4) collaboration, with shared work areas and simultaneous, potentially very close interaction inside the shared area.…”
Section: Illustrative Example: the Cobotmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As many types of human-robot interactions, Kaiser et al describe scenarios of co-existence [28]: (1) Encapsulation, with physically fenced robot work areas, (2) co-existence, without fencing but separation of human and robot work areas, (3) cooperation, with shared work areas but without simultaneous operation in the shared area, and (4) collaboration, with shared work areas and simultaneous, potentially very close interaction inside the shared area.…”
Section: Illustrative Example: the Cobotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accidents, their causes, and hazards in human-robot co-existence in manufacturing have been discussed in the literature since the mid 1970s (e.g. [54,27,2,28]). Notably, Nicolaisen [42] envisioned collaborative, potentially mobile, robots closely working together with humans in shared work areas in 1985.…”
Section: Analysing Safety Risks In Cobot Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wearable technology is the communication interface between man and machine. Kasier et al [2] found the ergonomic design of the wearable technology significantly impacts the user and therefore the effectiveness of the human-robot collaboration.…”
Section: A Significance Of Wearable Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In collaborative operation, the operator and the IRS (called a cobot [12]) can occupy the collaborative workspace (i.e., a subset of the safeguarded workspace) simultaneously while the IRS is performing tasks [13]. Based on that, ISO 15066 recommends four safety modes, described and combined with work layouts in [8], [14]: safety-rated monitored stop (powered but no simultaneous activity of robot and operator in shared workspace), hand-guided operation (zero-gravity control, guided by an operator, no actuation without operator input), speed & separation monitoring (speed continuously adapted to distance of robot and operator), and power & force limiting (reduced impact on the human body, a robot's power and applied forces are limited).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Does a selected controller correctly handle hazards when detected and return the system to a useful safe state? Contributions: We introduce a tool-supported method for the synthesis of discrete-event ASCs that meet safety requirements and optimise process performance for humanrobot cooperation (alternative use of shared workspace) and collaboration (simultaneous use of shared workspace, with close interaction) [8], [16]. We model the manufacturing process and its safety analysis as a Markov decision process (MDP) and select a correct-by-construction ASC from a set of MDP policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%