2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of Tofacitinib in a Real-World Cohort of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS:Adverse events (AEs) including reactivation of herpes zoster (HZ) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been reported from clinical trials of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated the incidence rates of AEs in a real-world study of UC patients given tofacitinib. METHODS:We collected data from 260 patients with UC in the Tofacitinib Real-world Outcomes in Patients with ulceratIve colitis and Crohn's disease consortium study, performed at 6 medical centers in the United States… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
89
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
89
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11,13 Furthermore, the incidence rate of AE (20.7/100 PYF) reported here is lower than what we reported in our recently published realworld study of tofacitinib monotherapy in UC (IR: 27.2 (95% CI, 24.4-30.7) /100 PYF. 29 Similarly, the proportion of patients with SAE in our TBT cohort is also lower compared to these previous tofacitinib monotherapy studies. This unexpected finding is likely due to differences in the definition and monitoring of AE between clinical trials and real-world data in our study as well as the relatively shorter duration of follow-up in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…11,13 Furthermore, the incidence rate of AE (20.7/100 PYF) reported here is lower than what we reported in our recently published realworld study of tofacitinib monotherapy in UC (IR: 27.2 (95% CI, 24.4-30.7) /100 PYF. 29 Similarly, the proportion of patients with SAE in our TBT cohort is also lower compared to these previous tofacitinib monotherapy studies. This unexpected finding is likely due to differences in the definition and monitoring of AE between clinical trials and real-world data in our study as well as the relatively shorter duration of follow-up in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…11, 13 Furthermore, the incidence rate of AE (20.7/100 PYF) reported here is lower than what we reported in our recently published real-world study of tofacitinib monotherapy in UC (IR: 27.2 (95% CI, 24.4–30.7) /100 PYF. 29 Similarly, the proportion of patients with SAE in our TBT cohort is also lower compared to these previous tofacitinib monotherapy studies. This unexpected finding is likely due to differences in the definition and monitoring of AE between clinical trials and real-world data in our study as well as the relatively shorter duration of follow-up in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…17,26 Our study has highlighted the difference in biomarker dynamics between patients who required and avoided colectomy and demonstrated the potential utility of CAR and CLR early in the treatment course (day 3 post salvage) in predicting infliximab failure. With the expansion of efficacious treatments such as newer biologic therapies and small molecule inhibitors, [27][28][29][30] the ability to predict disease trajectory in ASUC should inform treatment choice-for example, a patient who is likely to require longer term colectomy despite infliximab salvage may warrant more proactive optimization of maintenance therapy with a biologic agent (a top-down approach), while patients with a lower risk of colectomy may only require conventional therapy. [31][32][33] Although the ability to continue biologic therapy in all patients may appear attractive, a careful risk-benefit assessment should be made given such a strategy introduces an additional risk of infections and may not be cost-effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%