2021
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of surgical tracheostomy under continued antithrombotic therapy: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Objective: Although various guidelines have been established for the management of antithrombotic therapy during surgical treatments, surgical tracheostomy (ST) under continued antithrombotic therapy (CAT) remains challenging. Here, we investigated the risk factors for complications after ST by focusing on the application of CAT during ST.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We considered the presence of bleeding and infection as possible postoperative complications of interest. The postoperative period was defined as the interval between the date of surgery and the seventh postoperative day, following a previous rationale 22 . We defined “bleeding” as bleeding lasting 7 days after APS or bleeding requiring compression or surgical hemostasis and “infection” as a condition including anastomotic leakage requiring additional antibiotic administration or surgical treatment such as excision of the infected area and revision APS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered the presence of bleeding and infection as possible postoperative complications of interest. The postoperative period was defined as the interval between the date of surgery and the seventh postoperative day, following a previous rationale 22 . We defined “bleeding” as bleeding lasting 7 days after APS or bleeding requiring compression or surgical hemostasis and “infection” as a condition including anastomotic leakage requiring additional antibiotic administration or surgical treatment such as excision of the infected area and revision APS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The ORT group is disproportionately smaller due to increased provider preference for OBT since the implementation of the OBT program in 2016. However, the rates of the safety of ORT are well-established by multiple studies, [23][24][25][26] and the primary purpose of this study was not to evaluate the safety or outcomes of ORT but rather to demonstrate OBT in this community setting are comparable. The performing surgeon was not controlled for within or across tracheostomy location groups, and the data may not account for variations in certain practice patterns across different providers.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%