2020
DOI: 10.1111/head.13930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of Rimegepant, an Oral CGRP Receptor Antagonist, Plus CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine

Abstract: Objective Evaluate the safety and tolerability of oral rimegepant when used for acute treatment concomitantly with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) ligand or receptor (CGRP mAb) for the preventive treatment of migraine. Background The efficacy of CGRP mAbs for the preventive treatment of migraine and the small molecule CGRP receptor antagonist rimegepant for acute treatment has been demonstrated in randomized controlled clinical trials. Over the past few years, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(28 reference statements)
1
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2,11,12 A recent study reported no safety issues of using rimegepant in 13 patients that were on a CGRP mAb. 13 The results of the 62 (58.5%) patients that were concurrently using a CGRP mAb in our study support the efficacy of ubrogepant in this population given there was no difference on the "good responder" rate compared to those who were not on a CGRP mAb, 25 (41%) versus 25 (56.8%) patients, p = 0.11. The lack of complete, sustained blockade of the CGRP pathway of ligand or receptor-targeted CGRP mAbs may account for the therapeutic benefit of ubrogepant in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…1,2,11,12 A recent study reported no safety issues of using rimegepant in 13 patients that were on a CGRP mAb. 13 The results of the 62 (58.5%) patients that were concurrently using a CGRP mAb in our study support the efficacy of ubrogepant in this population given there was no difference on the "good responder" rate compared to those who were not on a CGRP mAb, 25 (41%) versus 25 (56.8%) patients, p = 0.11. The lack of complete, sustained blockade of the CGRP pathway of ligand or receptor-targeted CGRP mAbs may account for the therapeutic benefit of ubrogepant in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In such an event, rimegepant should be discontinued. In addition, no serious adverse events, including hepatotoxicity, were reported [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81].…”
Section: Rimegepantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rimegepant has not been administered to patients with end-stage renal disease (CLcr < 15 mL/min) or to patients on dialysis; therefore, its use should be avoided in these patients. No dosage adjustment of rimegepant is required for patients with mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment [69,76,77,79,80].…”
Section: Disease Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aus diesem Grund führen die jeweiligen FDA und EMA Zulassungen diesbezüglich auch keine Einschränkungen auf. Selbst bei einer Kombination von Gepanten mit monoklonalen CGRP/CGRP-Rezeptorantikörpern sind keine Hinweise auf ein erhöhtes Ischämierisiko aufgefallen [53].…”
Section: Sicherheitunclassified