2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1989-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of primaquine given to people with G6PD deficiency: systematic review of prospective studies

Abstract: BackgroundHaemolysis risk with single dose or short course primaquine was evaluated in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient people.MethodsMajor electronic databases (to August 2016) were searched for single or short course 8-aminoquinolines (8-AQ) in (1) randomized comparisons against placebo in G6PD deficient people; and (2) observational comparisons in G6PD deficient compared to replete people. Two authors independently assessed eligibility, risk-of-bias, and extracted data.ResultsFive randomiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with results from a preliminary study in the country in 2010 [36], and similary to the reports from other studies conducted in other African countries, as Mauritania [37], Uganda [38], Mozambique [39] Senegal [40,41] and Gambia [42]. The high G6PDd prevalence in the African or Afro-descendant population as shown by several studies [39][40][41][42][43] may reflect the population's exposure to malaria endemicity or ethnicity related [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, our results do not allow drawing any conclusions of this nature since almost all the participants of this study were of Cape Verdean citizenship and no ethnic classification was made.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are consistent with results from a preliminary study in the country in 2010 [36], and similary to the reports from other studies conducted in other African countries, as Mauritania [37], Uganda [38], Mozambique [39] Senegal [40,41] and Gambia [42]. The high G6PDd prevalence in the African or Afro-descendant population as shown by several studies [39][40][41][42][43] may reflect the population's exposure to malaria endemicity or ethnicity related [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. However, our results do not allow drawing any conclusions of this nature since almost all the participants of this study were of Cape Verdean citizenship and no ethnic classification was made.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The schizontocidal treatment for non-falciparum malaria is done with the AL or Artesunate + Amodiaquine, following the WHO guidelines [7]. Nevertheless, this use of primaquine is carried out regardless the knowledge of the frequency of the Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency among the target population, which endangers all the patients harbouring this deficiency with the risk of haemolysis [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of safety, adverse effects of PQ in people with G6PD deficiency are less common with lower doses of PQ ( Olalekan 2017 ), although direct comparisons are few and sample sizes small. Most trials included in this review excluded individuals with G6PD deficiency, but some included them, did not test for it or did not state whether they tested; thus some trials included some G6PD deficient participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These occasional, but clearly serious, adverse effects have led to a reputation of being "unsafe" ( Ashley 2014 ). Although the haemolysis appears less likely at lower dose, there have been few studies in G6PD‐deficient people at low doses of PQ ( Olalekan 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 ). The median difference in haemoglobin at day 14 (Hb at day 14 − Hb at baseline/Hb at baseline) [ 22 ] in ASMQ + Pq, AL + Pq, and CQ + Pq were − 0.74 (95% CI − 1.13; − 0.36), − 0.49 (95% CI − 0.87; − 0.09), and − 0.58 (95% CI − 0.91; − 0.24), respectively. These were not statistically different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%