2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of COVID-19 vaccines: A comparison between adverse drug reactions among vaccines marketed in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one of the latest issues of the European Journal of Internal Medicine, Pardo-Cabello et al. [8] reviewed the EudraVigilance database to assess the ADRs reported among patients who received COVID-19 vaccines marketed in the EU. This is a valuable approach even if it is not possible to draw strong conclusions on the safety profile given the intrinsic limits of data obtained from surveillance post-marketing databases (i.e., retrospective enrolment, lack of denominator, risk of duplicated and risk of selection bias, etc.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of the latest issues of the European Journal of Internal Medicine, Pardo-Cabello et al. [8] reviewed the EudraVigilance database to assess the ADRs reported among patients who received COVID-19 vaccines marketed in the EU. This is a valuable approach even if it is not possible to draw strong conclusions on the safety profile given the intrinsic limits of data obtained from surveillance post-marketing databases (i.e., retrospective enrolment, lack of denominator, risk of duplicated and risk of selection bias, etc.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%