The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199812)45:4<376::aid-ccd5>3.0.co;2-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of coronary arteriography in clinically stable patients following coronary bypass surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, conventional angiography is the only reliable method to determine the postoperative patency of LITA in spite of its invasivity and well-known disadvantages (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conventional angiography is the only reliable method to determine the postoperative patency of LITA in spite of its invasivity and well-known disadvantages (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,10 All native coronary arteries and coronary artery bypass grafts were injected, usually through 7F catheters, in a suggested standardized sequence of views. 8 LMCA segments were oriented in the image plane and clearly seen in at least two different views. Additional studies performed to assess the reproducibility of readings and the repeatability of imaging indicated that the magnitude of variability was small and had negligible impact on the angiographic measurements.…”
Section: Angiographic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although current trials may be more aggressive and attain lower LDL-C levels than the Post CABG Trial, the terms aggressive and moderate were retained to be consistent with previous publications. [1][2][3][5][6][7][8][9] …”
Section: See P 2635mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology guidelines found MPS to be 'appropriate' for this category of patients, without further explanation (2). However, the prognosis of patients with normal MPS is so favourable (2-4) that invasive procedures mean a stepping-up in risk, which tends to increase with age, comorbidities and the number of previous interventions (8,9,(24)(25)(26). Therefore, the clinical evaluation of an individual patient should be sufficiently accurate as to justify direct referral for catheterization and potential revascularization by reliably sorting out most patients with normal myocardial perfusion and insignificant coronary artery disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%