2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of Carotid Stenting (CAS) is Based on Institutional Training More than Individual Experience in Large-volume Centres

Abstract: Institutional experience, including instruction on selection of patients and materials best suited for the procedure, is a primary factor driving outcomes of CAS. An effective team-working approach can reliably improve the training of new trainees preserving CAS safety and efficacy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding CAS, there is no consensus on the minimum number of CAS procedures required to define safety 5 nor for maintenance of competency. 21 Moreover, different specialty societies have different elements which define competency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding CAS, there is no consensus on the minimum number of CAS procedures required to define safety 5 nor for maintenance of competency. 21 Moreover, different specialty societies have different elements which define competency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAS complication rates may also be related to collective institutional proficiency and experience encompassing factors such as patient selection, device selection, and adjunctive medical management, along with reviews of lessons learnt from collegial reviews of all cases. 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, operator volume was not available in this study because of the limitation of NHIRD. Hospital volume, however, may be more important than operator volume, as shown in a prior study . Third, the accurate definition for ischemic stroke and ICH cannot be fully validated during the periprocedural period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospital volume, however, may be more important than operator volume, as shown in a prior study [22]. First, the propensity score matching eliminated the heterogeneity between two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%