2019
DOI: 10.1111/trf.15132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety of blood donation by individuals over age 70 and their contribution to the blood supply in five developed countries: a BEST Collaborative group study

Abstract: BACKGROUND Some countries impose an upper age limit on whole blood and double RBC donation while others do not. We evaluated the safety of blood donation in older individuals (≥71 years), and their contribution to the blood supply of five countries. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Twelve blood center members of the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative from four countries with no upper age limit for whole blood and double RBC donation (Canada, New Zealand, England, and the United States) or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When allowed to donate, older donors “punch above their weight,” making a more substantial contribution to the blood supply than younger donors. The BEST Collaborative study reported that while donors aged 70+ years accounted for only 1.0% to 4.2% of the donor population in each country, they contributed 1.5% to 5.7% of total donations . This is consistent with earlier research showing that older donors make more donations per year than younger donors .…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When allowed to donate, older donors “punch above their weight,” making a more substantial contribution to the blood supply than younger donors. The BEST Collaborative study reported that while donors aged 70+ years accounted for only 1.0% to 4.2% of the donor population in each country, they contributed 1.5% to 5.7% of total donations . This is consistent with earlier research showing that older donors make more donations per year than younger donors .…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…While the existing research consistently finds young donors at particularly high risk of an adverse reaction to blood donation, it has remained unclear whether the oldest donors may be at increased risk of certain adverse outcomes compared to donors in their middle years or those approaching older age. The study by Goldman and colleagues on behalf of the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative in this issue of TRANSFUSION provides valuable additional insights. The authors analyzed data from more than 200,000 donors over 70 years of age who presented at 12 blood centers across five countries (Canada, Australia, England/North Wales, New Zealand, and the United States), all of which, except Australia, had eliminated upper age limits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous increase in donations by adolescent donors was thought to be in response to an aging donor population and a need for younger donors . The number of source plasma collections continues to increase in the United States . In part because over half of plasma donors are aged 18‐34 years, some concerns have been reported that younger donors are donating plasma rather than blood because of financial compensation with plasma donation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,16 The number of source plasma collections continues to increase in the United States. [17][18][19] In part because over half of plasma donors are aged 18-34 years, 18 some concerns have been reported that younger donors are donating plasma rather than blood because of financial compensation with plasma donation. 17,19 Additionally, evidence indicates that adolescent (aged ≤18 years) donors face a greater risk of iron depletion and vasovagal reactions than adult donors.…”
Section: Donorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation