2015
DOI: 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12065.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Measures after the 2011 Joplin, Missouri, Tornado

Abstract: Immediately following the May 2011 tornado, the city of Joplin, Missouri, initiated recovery efforts to rebuild the part of the community devastated by this event. In doing so, city officials introduced two new safety measures and recommended several others. The main objective of this paper is to explore the tornado survivors' compliance with the safety features recommended by the Joplin city authorities. Face‐to‐face interviews, as well as other methods, were used to survey respondents who were living within … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People move out of affected communities because of many factors: (a) limited access to employment opportunities, particularly in small communities; (b) lack of safety and security provision in the aftermath of the disaster; (c) non-availability of housing or increased housing costs; and (d) previous migration experience (Fothergill & Peek, 2004;Haney, 2018; International O ce of Migration, 2008; Pais & Elliot, 2008). Movement also depends on the imposition of new land use regulations, building codes and construction practices, and other programs such as new development restrictions by emergency managers and local government entities of disaster-affected communities (Lindell & Prater, 2003;Paul & Stimers, 2015;Tierney et al, 2001). Some disaster-affected communities show no effect on the total population size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…People move out of affected communities because of many factors: (a) limited access to employment opportunities, particularly in small communities; (b) lack of safety and security provision in the aftermath of the disaster; (c) non-availability of housing or increased housing costs; and (d) previous migration experience (Fothergill & Peek, 2004;Haney, 2018; International O ce of Migration, 2008; Pais & Elliot, 2008). Movement also depends on the imposition of new land use regulations, building codes and construction practices, and other programs such as new development restrictions by emergency managers and local government entities of disaster-affected communities (Lindell & Prater, 2003;Paul & Stimers, 2015;Tierney et al, 2001). Some disaster-affected communities show no effect on the total population size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these safety measures reduce the risk of loss of life, injury, and property damage, as well as increase tornado resilience for households and communities, these measures require the nancial abilities of the households. For example, the construction of prefabricated safe rooms ranges in price from as low as $3,000-$9,500, depending on size and height (Paul & Stimers, 2015). Note that in some states of the United States, such as Oklahoma, there are better options than a basement due to high water table levels, which render basement construction challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%