2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety issues to be taken into account in designing future nuclear fusion facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum offsite dose induced by radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents is around 2.3 μSv/year. 41 For DEMO and beyond, the presence of the larger amount of tritium, larger volumes of cooling water and more release paths, is expected to lead to an increase in radioactive materials released into the environment under routine operations. Therefore, the release target of DEMO and beyond could be higher than ITER.…”
Section: Routine Releases Of Radioactive Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum offsite dose induced by radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents is around 2.3 μSv/year. 41 For DEMO and beyond, the presence of the larger amount of tritium, larger volumes of cooling water and more release paths, is expected to lead to an increase in radioactive materials released into the environment under routine operations. Therefore, the release target of DEMO and beyond could be higher than ITER.…”
Section: Routine Releases Of Radioactive Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, doses caused by HTO and HT releases under normal operations are typically less than 3 μSv/year for PHWRs in Canada 40 . For ITER, the annual tritium releases as gas in years of heavy maintenance, which mainly come from the degassing of internal components in the vacuum vessel and in the hot cell, should not more than 2.5 g, while in other years the limit is 0.6 g of tritium 41 . Liquid effluents from the ITER will be mainly the slightly tritiated liquid effluents, which come from the air detritiation systems and the treatment of water from the cooling systems.…”
Section: Quantitative Safety Goals Proposed For Fusion Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety of nuclear fusion systems has to be proved and verified by a systematic analysis of the system behavior under operational transients and accidental conditions [e.g., loss of coolant accidents (Rivas et al, 2015)], and the corresponding (safety) issues and gaps have to be highlighted (Perrault, 2016;Wu et al, 2016). Indeed, contamination from radioactive sources (e.g., tritium and the materials activated by the neutrons produced by the fusion reactions) must be avoided for the operators and public safety, and for the environment (Taylor and Cortes, 2014;Taylor et al, 2017).…”
Section: Figure 1 the Iter Tf Magnets (Iter)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although fusion power plants will release small quantities of tritium to within already defined limits, they will not produce greenhouse gases or other air pollutants [34]. As a result, the environmental impacts associated with nuclear fusion power plants will instead be primarily attributed to construction, operation and maintenance, including fuel supply chains, and waste disposal.…”
Section: Environmental Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%