2001
DOI: 10.2307/3094826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety in Numbers: Downsizing and the Deinstitutionalization of Permanent Employment in Japan

Abstract: an Tschoegl, and seminar participants at U.C. Berkeley. Appreciation also goes to Eleanor Westney for encouraging research in this area. We also thank Dan Brass, Linda Johanson, and three anonymous ASQ reviewers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
355
2
19

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 426 publications
(393 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
9
355
2
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the evident difficulty of justifying the adoption of a golden parachute plan at that time should lead boards to implement plans similar to those that have already been adopted by other large corporations. Adopting a fairly standard plan allows the boards to point toward precedent as well as "safety in numbers" (Ahmadjian and Robinson 2001), which appears particularly important given the challenges in rationalizing the plan based on the timing of the adoption. Such last-minute parachutes have also been criticized as contracts that are legally not enforceable because the executives had not done anything to warrant the payout (e.g., Greenhouse 1985), but prior adoption and payout of similar plans reduces the likelihood of court challenges for the board.…”
Section: Organization-level Mechanisms Affecting Practice Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the evident difficulty of justifying the adoption of a golden parachute plan at that time should lead boards to implement plans similar to those that have already been adopted by other large corporations. Adopting a fairly standard plan allows the boards to point toward precedent as well as "safety in numbers" (Ahmadjian and Robinson 2001), which appears particularly important given the challenges in rationalizing the plan based on the timing of the adoption. Such last-minute parachutes have also been criticized as contracts that are legally not enforceable because the executives had not done anything to warrant the payout (e.g., Greenhouse 1985), but prior adoption and payout of similar plans reduces the likelihood of court challenges for the board.…”
Section: Organization-level Mechanisms Affecting Practice Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, how do traditional practices change due to increases in market pressures (broadly defined)? Ahmadjian and Robinson (2001) examined the changing nature of the employment relation in Japanese firms during the 1990s. During the extended period of economic growth that Japan experienced from the 1950s to the late 1980s, core firms were able to make (and keep) promises of long-term employment for their workers, recruiting college graduates who intended to stay with the organization for their entire careers.…”
Section: Examples From New Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From then on, many firms have sought to accomplish restructuring through organizational downsizing -defined as the planned and permanent reduction of an organization's workforce DeWitt, 1993). Despite frequent and ongoing corporate downsizing activities -not only in the United States (Chadwick et al, 2004;Chen et al, 2001;De Meuse et al, 2004) but also in European (Filatotchev et al, 2000) and Asian countries (Ahmadjian & Robinson, 2001; Lee, 1997;Yu & Park, 2006)-and some reported improvements in corporate performance (McKinley, 1993;Sutton, 1987), expected positive outcomes of downsizing are often elusive (Cascio, 1993;Levinson, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%