2008
DOI: 10.1080/13545700802262931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety First, Then Condoms: Commercial Sex, Risky Behavior, and the Spread of HIV/AIDS in Managua, Nicaragua

Abstract: This study analyzes the commercial sex market in Managua, Nicaragua, to understand risky behavior among sex workers. While health risks are a major concern for sex workers, the risk of violence weighs more heavily in decision making, such that they more often take risks to their health than to their immediate, physical well-being. These concerns are reflected in the lower premiums sex workers charge for unprotected sex (39 percent more for vaginal sex without a condom) compared with risks of violence, such as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not using a condom is not only inspired by price incentives but may be inspired by other motivations, for example, for fear of violent reactions by clients. This has recently been documented in a prostitution study in Managua (Nicaragua) (Willman 2008) and is supported by other research, both quantitative (Shannon et al 2009) and qualitative (Busza 2005). The evidence thus suggests the existence of a different kind of compensating differential: in some instances sex workers have the choice between getting a beating with a condom and getting out in one piece at the cost of having unprotected sex.…”
Section: Explaining Unsafe Sex: Clients' Preferencessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Not using a condom is not only inspired by price incentives but may be inspired by other motivations, for example, for fear of violent reactions by clients. This has recently been documented in a prostitution study in Managua (Nicaragua) (Willman 2008) and is supported by other research, both quantitative (Shannon et al 2009) and qualitative (Busza 2005). The evidence thus suggests the existence of a different kind of compensating differential: in some instances sex workers have the choice between getting a beating with a condom and getting out in one piece at the cost of having unprotected sex.…”
Section: Explaining Unsafe Sex: Clients' Preferencessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Wahab (2005) reports that 50-100 percent of those working in outdoor (street-based) settings experience violent encounters while on the job; in our study (which includes both indoor and outdoor workers) about 27 percent of our sample had experienced violence at the hands of a customer. 2 Sex workers from a range of work settings support the claim that violent encounters are shaped by the setting of the workplace, as well as other features of the social context of their work (Brents and Hausbeck 2005;Church et al 2001;Fang et al 2007;Giobbe et al 1990; Katsulis 2009;Kempadoo and Doezema 1998;Lopez-Jones 1999;Plumridge and Abel 2001;Willman 2008). Studies also show the myriad ways in which sex workers experience, manage, or attempt to avoid violent encounters while working in these settings (Bowen et al 2006;Downe 1999;Kinnell 2008;Kurtz et al 2004;Maher 2000;Otutubikey Izugbara 2005;Sanders 2004;Shannon et al 2008;Sterk and Elifson 1990;Whittaker and Hart 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 Other examples include Kenya (Robinson & Yeh, 2011), Mexico (de la Torre et al, 2010, Nicaragua (Willman, 2008), Congo (Ntumbanzondo et al, 2006) and Canada (Johnston et al, 2010). 3 Since 1969, Senegalese FSWs over the age of 21 years have been compelled to register with a health centre and to have routine check-ups to be tested and treated for STDs and to receive free condoms (Chersich et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Other examples include Kenya (Robinson & Yeh, 2011), Mexico (de la Torre et al, 2010), Nicaragua (Willman, 2008), Congo (Ntumbanzondo et al, 2006) and Canada (Johnston et al, 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%