Safety Culture in the Gynecology Robotics Operating Room

Zullo, Melissa D.; McCarroll, Michele L.; Mendise, T.; Ferris, Edward F.; Roulette, G. Dante; Zolton, Jessica R.; Andrews, Stephen; Gruenigen, Vivian E. von

doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.027

Cited by 14 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nineteen studies (40.43%) were from the USA, nine studies (19.15%) were from the UK, seven (40.43%) from China, two (4.26%) from Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, respectively, and one study (2.13%) from Netherlands, Canada, Japan, Italy, and Switzerland, respectively. There were also one multinational study and the investigated population was from US, Canada, India, Jordan, New Zealand, Philippines, Tanzania, and UK …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of patient safety culture instruments in operating rooms: A systematic literature review

Zhao

et al. 2017

J Evidence Based Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the 47 studies, the most commonly used scale was the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), which was used in 25 (53.19%) studies . The Operating Room Management Attitude Questionnaire (ORMAQ) was also common as it was used in eight (17.02%) studies .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of patient safety culture instruments in operating rooms: A systematic literature review

Zhao

et al. 2017

J Evidence Based Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Agency for Health Care Research and Quality has cited that miscommunication events among operating room staff were a key indicator for critical errors and omissions in established standards of care [17]. Improved safety culture and team cohesiveness where found to be the key link in the WHO checklist implementation; however, team cohesiveness did not necessarily play a part in the RORCC study as indicated by Zullo et al [18].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The ''camp fire'' idea relates to the team cohesiveness demonstrated by the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) and WHO checklist literature which demonstrates that improved team approach or cohesiveness resulted in the significant clinical changes in error reductions, surgical site infections, and death [8,16,20]. Team cohesiveness was measured and reported for the RORCC implementation by Zullo et al which found varying results in discipline specific team cohesiveness using the SAQ [18].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and implementation results of an interactive computerized surgical checklist for robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To address surgical complications, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Safe Surgery Saves Lives Checklist. With the foundation of the WHO's checklist, a robotic-specific checklist (RORCC) was developed using standardized content and face validity methods. The RORCC was implemented in a high volume gynecological (GYN) specialty group using minimally invasive robotic-assisted surgery. Data were abstracted from patients undergoing GYN procedures from four GYN surgeons at an urban, community hospital during November 16, 2010 to May 15, 2011 (pre-RORCC) n = 89 and from the period May 16, 2011 to November 16 2011 (post-RORCC) n = 121. Thirty-day readmissions pre-checklist and post-checklist were 12 and 5, respectively, which is a significant (p = 0.02) reduction. The duration of surgery was not significantly affected (p = 0.40) with pre-RORCC surgery time at 110.1 (35.7) min versus post-RORCC surgery time at 112.9 (37.4) min. This study demonstrated the feasibility of integrating an electronic, interactive, and robotic-specific checklist for gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery which resulted in a significant reduction in readmissions at the 30-day without significantly impacting operating room times.

show abstract

“…Zullo et al (20) report that only the communication and collaboration between the different members of the team allows you to make a safe procedure.…”

Section: 3 Days Nsmentioning

confidence: 99%