2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety climate as a predictor of work ability problems in blue-collar workers: prospective cohort study

Abstract: ObjectivesTo evaluate whether safety climate items would be predictive of future physical and mental work ability among blue-collar workers.MethodsBlue-collar workers (n=3822) from the Danish Work Environment and Health study replied to questions on safety climate, physical and mental work ability, and health in 2012 and 2014. Using multivariate logistic regression, we estimated the association of number of safety climate items (0–5) in 2012 with physical and mental work ability in 2014. Potential confounders … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have established a link between safety climate items with occupational accidents, injuries, and illnesses [44][45][46]. Our study does expand on this finding and emphasizes that safety climate items can impact employees' work ability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Previous studies have established a link between safety climate items with occupational accidents, injuries, and illnesses [44][45][46]. Our study does expand on this finding and emphasizes that safety climate items can impact employees' work ability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The differences in the connection between PAHCO and physical health could be due to work-specific factors, such as occupational sitting time [ 16 ] and mental work-related demands [ 69 ], which account for larger shares of the physical health variance in OWs compared to other occupational groups, such as blue-collar employees who perform physical and manual work (e.g., manufacturing and landscaping) [ 70 ]. In addition, Besharati et al [ 71 ] have underscored the relevance of mental work-related demands and occupational sitting time in OWs’ physical health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, six questions were asked for demographic information, and a 5-point Likert scale was used to respond to the questionnaire. For the safety climate section, the NOSACQ-50-English2019 questionnaire by Brandt et al (2021) was used, which consists of 28 items across four dimensions of safety climate i.e. a) workers' safety commitment b) workers' safety priority and risk non-acceptance c) safety communication, learning, and trust in co-worker's safety competence d) trust in the efficacy of safety systems (42).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the safety climate section, the NOSACQ-50-English2019 questionnaire by Brandt et al (2021) was used, which consists of 28 items across four dimensions of safety climate i.e. a) workers' safety commitment b) workers' safety priority and risk non-acceptance c) safety communication, learning, and trust in co-worker's safety competence d) trust in the efficacy of safety systems (42). A 4-point Likert scale was used for this section, and scores above 3.30 were considered indicative of a good level of safety climate, while scores below 2.70 were deemed to indicate a low level of safety climate, requiring significant improvement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%