2020
DOI: 10.1002/jum.15323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety Assessment of an A‐Scan Ultrasonic System for Ophthalmic Use

Abstract: Objectives-This study describes the safety assessment of an A-scan ultrasonic system for ophthalmic use. The system is an investigational medical device for automatic cataract detection and classification. Methods-The risk management was based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard DIN EN ISO 14971:2009-10 and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard IEC 60601-2-37. The calibration of the ultrasonic field was conducted according to the standards IEC 62127-1:2007 an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the measured acoustic pressure at the focal point position is 14.57 Pa, corresponding to the spatial-peak temporal average I SPTA of 0.48 μW/mm 2 even with continuous wave excitation. When pulse waves with 5 cycles and a pulse repetition interval (PRI) of 10 ms are used, the I SPTA is smaller than 0.24 nW/mm 2 as the number of cycles decreases and the sound pressure decreases, meeting the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers (0.17 mW/mm 2 ) 24 . Therefore, there should be no harm to the body 25 , 26 , guaranteeing that the transducer does not damage the eyes.…”
Section: Design and Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Note that the measured acoustic pressure at the focal point position is 14.57 Pa, corresponding to the spatial-peak temporal average I SPTA of 0.48 μW/mm 2 even with continuous wave excitation. When pulse waves with 5 cycles and a pulse repetition interval (PRI) of 10 ms are used, the I SPTA is smaller than 0.24 nW/mm 2 as the number of cycles decreases and the sound pressure decreases, meeting the requirements of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers (0.17 mW/mm 2 ) 24 . Therefore, there should be no harm to the body 25 , 26 , guaranteeing that the transducer does not damage the eyes.…”
Section: Design and Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A safety evaluation of the ESUS has been previously reported [ 31 ]. The ESUS has been implemented in agreement with Portuguese Law n° 145/2009 and with Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament.…”
Section: Ethics Safety and Disseminationmentioning
confidence: 99%